Stein Murray
Goldiwil, Thun, Switzerland.
J Anal Psychol. 2008 Jun;53(3):305-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2008.00729.x.
The self is more than conscious identity and location (i.e., the ego) because it includes and expresses the full range of the psyche, all conscious and unconscious elements included, and it is responsible for the unity of the psyche as a whole. Beyond this, the self concept sets up the basis for the linkage between analytical psychology and religious doctrines of transcendence. It has been stated by critics and sympathizers that Jung was a 'mystic', or a throwback to pre-Enlightenment medievalism, who equated the self with God, mixed up categories of transcendence and immanence, and put the psyche on a symbolic par with Divinity. While this does contain a kernel of truth about his late views, it is not quite as straightforward as it sounds. This essay(1) explores the complex relation of the self to the transcendent (Divinity), as Jung understood these terms and employed them, focusing especially on a critical passage from his last major work, Mysterium Coniunctionis. The notion of self as imago Dei grasps the paradoxical nature of the self, a coincidentia oppositorum that is at once personal and impersonal, embodying a pattern of Divinity that also is revealed as a coincidentia oppositorum, immanent and transcendent. Jung posits, moreover, a dynamic interactive relation between the self and the transcendence it mirrors. Altogether, this combination of features regarding the self sets Jung's psychology apart from humanistic and personalistic psychologies and secular depth psychologies such as those descended from Freud on the one side, and on the other side it also separates it from pre-Enlightenment dogmatic psychologies such as those belonging to religious fundamentalisms. This essay attempts to explore and to explicate the subtle space between purely secular and religious doctrines and to make the case that Jung's depth psychology represents a post-Enlightenment, post-secular, post-humanistic vision of the human as a material/spiritual being whose psyche links earth and heaven, the here and the beyond, the finite and the infinite. It is a radical attempt to break out of modernity without regressing to medievalism.
自我不仅仅是有意识的身份认同和定位(即自我),因为它包含并表达了心灵的全部范畴,涵盖所有有意识和无意识的元素,并且它负责心灵整体的统一性。除此之外,自我概念为分析心理学与超越性宗教教义之间的联系奠定了基础。批评者和支持者都曾指出,荣格是一个“神秘主义者”,或者是倒退到启蒙运动前的中世纪主义,他将自我等同于上帝,混淆了超越与内在的范畴,并将心灵与神性置于象征等同的地位。虽然这确实包含了关于他晚期观点的一丝真理,但事情并非听起来那么简单直接。本文探讨了自我与超越者(神性)之间的复杂关系,正如荣格对这些术语的理解和运用,尤其聚焦于他最后一部主要著作《炼金术的奥秘》中的一段关键论述。将自我视为上帝形象的概念把握了自我的矛盾本质,即一种对立物的统一,它既是个人的又是非个人的,体现了一种神性模式,这种模式也被揭示为一种对立物的统一,既是内在的又是超越的。此外,荣格假定自我与它所映照的超越者之间存在动态的互动关系。总体而言,关于自我的这些特征组合使荣格的心理学有别于人文主义心理学、个人主义心理学以及诸如源自弗洛伊德的世俗深度心理学,另一方面,也将其与启蒙运动前的教条心理学,比如那些属于宗教原教旨主义的心理学区分开来。本文试图探索并阐明纯粹世俗教义与宗教教义之间的微妙空间,并论证荣格的深度心理学代表了一种启蒙运动后、后世俗、后人文主义的对人类的看法,即人类是物质/精神存在,其心灵连接着大地与天堂、此岸与彼岸、有限与无限。这是一次激进的尝试,旨在突破现代性而不退回中世纪主义。