Bowling Ann, Culliford Lucy, Smith David, Rowe Gene, Reeves Barnaby C
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Hampstead Campus, London, UK.
Health Expect. 2008 Jun;11(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00482.x.
To measure preferences for angina treatments among patients admitted from accident and emergency with acute coronary syndrome.
Evidence suggests variability in treatment allocations amongst certain socio-demographic groups (e.g. related to age and sex), although it is unclear whether this reflects patient choice, as research on patients' treatment preferences is sparse. Given current policy emphasis on 'patient choice', providers need to anticipate patients' preferences to plan appropriate and acceptable health services.
Self-administered questionnaire survey.
In-patients in a UK hospital.
A convenience sample of 53 newly admitted patients with acute coronary syndrome. Exclusion criteria were: a previous cardiologist consultation (including previous revascularization); a clinical judgement of too ill to participate; post-admission death; non-cardiac reasons for chest pain.
Patients' preferences for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); angioplasty; and two medication alternatives.
Angioplasty was the preferred treatment (for 80% of respondents), and CABG was second (most preferred by 19%, but second most preferred for 60%). The two least preferred (and least acceptable) treatments were medications. The majority of patients (83%) would 'choose treatment based on the extent of benefits' and 'accept any treatment, no matter how extreme, to return to health'. There were some differences in preference related to age (>70 years preferred medication to a greater degree than <70 years) and sex (males preferred CABG surgery more than females).
There was general preference for procedural interventions over medication, but most patients would accept any treatment, however extreme, to return to former health. There was some evidence of differences in preferences related to age and sex. Furthermore, most patients preferred to have some input into treatment choice (e.g. nearly half wanted to share decision responsibility with their doctor), with only 4% preferring to leave the decision entirely to their doctor. Given these findings, and past findings that suggest there may be variability in treatment allocation according to certain socio-demographic factors, this study suggests a need to develop and use preference measures, and makes a step towards this.
测量因急性冠脉综合征从急诊入院的患者对心绞痛治疗方法的偏好。
有证据表明某些社会人口统计学群体(如与年龄和性别相关的群体)在治疗分配上存在差异,不过目前尚不清楚这是否反映了患者的选择,因为关于患者治疗偏好的研究较少。鉴于当前政策强调“患者选择”,医疗服务提供者需要预测患者的偏好,以规划合适且可接受的医疗服务。
自行填写的问卷调查。
英国一家医院的住院患者。
53名新入院的急性冠脉综合征患者的便利样本。排除标准为:曾接受心脏病专家会诊(包括先前的血运重建);临床判断病情过重无法参与;入院后死亡;因非心脏原因导致胸痛。
患者对冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)、血管成形术以及两种药物治疗方案的偏好。
血管成形术是首选治疗方法(80%的受访者选择),冠状动脉搭桥术排第二(19%的人最偏好,60%的人第二偏好)。两种最不被偏好(且最不可接受)的治疗方法是药物治疗。大多数患者(83%)会“根据获益程度选择治疗方法”,并且“接受任何治疗,无论多么极端,以恢复健康”。在偏好方面存在一些与年龄(70岁以上患者比70岁以下患者更倾向于药物治疗)和性别(男性比女性更倾向于冠状动脉搭桥手术)相关的差异。
与药物治疗相比,患者普遍更倾向于手术干预,但大多数患者会接受任何治疗,无论多么极端,以恢复健康。有证据表明在偏好方面存在与年龄和性别相关的差异。此外,大多数患者希望在治疗选择上有一定参与(例如近一半的患者希望与医生共同承担决策责任),只有4%的患者希望完全由医生做决定。鉴于这些发现,以及过去表明根据某些社会人口统计学因素治疗分配可能存在差异的研究结果,本研究表明需要开发和使用偏好测量方法,并朝着这一方向迈出了一步。