Einav S, Matot I, Berkenstadt H, Bromiker R, Weiniger C F
Intensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008 Jul;17(3):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 May 22.
Guidelines for the management of cardiac arrest during pregnancy exist but they are based on little research. The study hypothesis was that experienced medical clinicians who specialise in obstetric care would not follow current International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation/American Heart Association recommendations in this situation.
Following waiver of informed consent by the institutional review board, an anonymous structured scenario questionnaire survey was conducted among relevant hospital clinicians. Demographic details included field of expertise and resuscitation experience. A single case vignette of maternal cardiac arrest was presented, followed by nine questions to examine knowledge of existing recommendations for maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 12 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).
The overall response rate was 67% (30/45 questionnaires). Specialist obstetricians, midwives and anaesthetists from 17 hospitals participated. Forty-three percent (n=13) claimed broad experience, 50% (n=15) claimed some experience and 6.7% (n=2) claimed no experience in adult resuscitation. Participants were divided in their opinions regarding every choice of action: positioning, need to administer cricoid pressure during mask ventilation, timing of intubation, location of external chest compression, location of paddle placement for delivery of shock during ventricular fibrillation, the timing of defibrillation versus fetal delivery, medication doses and the need to rupture the membranes at an early phase of the resuscitation.
Specialist clinicians who treat pregnant women in hospital on a daily basis possess a limited knowledge of the recommendations for treating maternal cardiac arrest.
虽然存在关于孕期心脏骤停管理的指南,但这些指南的研究依据很少。本研究的假设是,专门从事产科护理的经验丰富的医学临床医生在这种情况下不会遵循当前国际复苏联合委员会/美国心脏协会的建议。
在机构审查委员会豁免知情同意后,对相关医院的临床医生进行了一项匿名的结构化情景问卷调查。人口统计学细节包括专业领域和复苏经验。呈现了一个孕产妇心脏骤停的单病例 vignette,随后提出了九个问题,以考查对孕产妇心肺复苏现有建议的了解情况。使用 SPSS 12 版软件(SPSS 公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行统计分析。
总体回复率为 67%(45 份问卷中的 30 份)。来自 17 家医院的产科专家、助产士和麻醉师参与了调查。43%(n = 13)声称有丰富经验,50%(n = 15)声称有一些经验,6.7%(n = 2)声称没有成人复苏经验。参与者对每一项行动选择的意见都存在分歧:体位、面罩通气时是否需要施加环状软骨压迫、插管时机、胸外按压位置、心室颤动时除颤电极板放置位置、除颤与胎儿娩出的时机、药物剂量以及复苏早期是否需要破膜。
日常在医院治疗孕妇的专科临床医生对治疗孕产妇心脏骤停的建议了解有限。