McAdams Timothy R, Biswal Sandip, Stevens Kathryn J, Beaulieu Christopher F, Mandelbaum Bert R
Department of Orthpaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 1000 Welch Road, Suite 100, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Sep;16(9):818-22. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0554-6. Epub 2008 May 31.
The purpose of this study is to compare the local microfracture effects of antegrade versus retrograde drilling of the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic ACL excision was performed on eight matched cadaveric knees. Arthroscopic guided tibial tunnel reaming was performed in either an antegrade (four) or retrograde (four) direction. A 3 x 3 cm section of proximal tibial surrounding the tibial aperture was removed with open dissection, and each section underwent micro-computed tomography analysis. Three musculoskeletal radiologists graded the specimens for bone aperture disruption and discrete fracture lines. Tibial aperture irregularity was seen in all four of the antegrade specimens (mean, Grade 1.5), and in none of the retrograde specimens. Discrete fracture lines were present in all four antegrade specimens (mean 10.13 mm depth; 8.95 mm length). No fracture lines were seen in the retrograde group. Retrograde drilling of the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction results in less microfracture trauma to the surrounding aperture bone. The use of retrograde drilling in ACL reconstruction may decrease synovialization of the graft-tissue interface when compared to antegrade drilling.
本研究的目的是比较前交叉韧带重建术中胫骨隧道顺行钻孔与逆行钻孔的局部微骨折效应。对8对匹配的尸体膝关节进行关节镜下前交叉韧带切除。在关节镜引导下,以顺行(4例)或逆行(4例)方向进行胫骨隧道扩孔。通过开放解剖切除围绕胫骨孔的近端胫骨3×3 cm的切片,每个切片进行微型计算机断层扫描分析。三位肌肉骨骼放射科医生对标本的骨孔破坏和离散骨折线进行分级。在所有4例顺行标本中均可见胫骨孔不规则(平均,1.5级),而在逆行标本中均未见到。所有4例顺行标本中均存在离散骨折线(平均深度10.13 mm;长度8.95 mm)。逆行组未见骨折线。前交叉韧带重建术中胫骨隧道逆行钻孔对周围孔骨的微骨折创伤较小。与顺行钻孔相比,前交叉韧带重建术中使用逆行钻孔可能会减少移植物-组织界面的滑膜化。