Suppr超能文献

两种城市固体废物焚烧炉飞灰与不同碱性试剂在洗涤实验中的比较。

Comparison of two types of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ashes with different alkaline reagents in washing experiments.

作者信息

Zhu Fenfen, Takaoka Masaki, Oshita Kazuyuki, Takeda Nobuo

机构信息

Kyoto University, Department of Urban and Environment Engineering, Kyoto City, 615-8540, Japan.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2009 Jan;29(1):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Jun 9.

Abstract

In this study, we propose a "washing-calcination-conversion of washed fly ash into cement material with bottom ash" (WCCB) system to reduce the amount of fly ash that must be specially treated so it can be used as raw cement material. Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is widely used in air-pollution control devices of incinerators while sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) is not. We conducted single-, double-, and triple-washing experiments to compare the washing characteristics of two types of fly ash. Unlike NaHCO3 fly ash, Ca(OH)2 fly ash has almost twice as much washed residue and almost 2.5 times more chlorine after the same washing procedure. After washing once, the washing frequency is also important for NaHCO3 fly ash, while the mixing time and liquid/solid ratio are more critical for Ca(OH)2 fly ash. The use of NaHCO3 is more suitable for the WCCB system.

摘要

在本研究中,我们提出了一种“水洗-煅烧-将水洗飞灰与底灰转化为水泥材料”(WCCB)系统,以减少必须经过特殊处理才能用作水泥原料的飞灰量。氢氧化钙(Ca(OH)₂)广泛用于焚烧炉的空气污染控制装置,而碳酸氢钠(NaHCO₃)则不然。我们进行了单洗、双洗和三洗实验,以比较两种飞灰的水洗特性。与NaHCO₃飞灰不同,经过相同的水洗程序后,Ca(OH)₂飞灰的水洗残渣几乎多出一倍,氯含量几乎多出2.5倍。单次水洗后,水洗频率对NaHCO₃飞灰也很重要,而混合时间和液固比对Ca(OH)₂飞灰更为关键。NaHCO₃的使用更适合WCCB系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验