De José María Belén, Banús Ester, Navarro Egea Montse, Serrano Silvia, Perelló Marina, Mabrok Maged
Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):838-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02644.x. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
Supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks are not common in children because of risk of pneumothorax. However, infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks have been described in paediatric patients both with nerve stimulation and ultrasound (US)-guidance. US-guidance reduces the risk of complications in supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in adults.
To compare the success rate, complications and time of performance of US-guided supraclavicular vs infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in children.
Eighty children, 5-15 years old, scheduled for upper limb surgery were divided into two randomized groups: group S (supraclavicular), n = 40, and group I (infraclavicular), n = 40. All blocks performed were exclusively US-guided, by a senior anaesthesiologist with at least 6 months of experience in US-guided blocks. For supraclavicular blocks the probe was placed in coronal-oblique-plane in the supraclavicular fossa and the puncture was in-plane (IP) from lateral to medial. For infraclavicular blocks the probe was placed parallel and below the clavicle and the puncture was out-of-plane. Ropivacaine 0.5% was administered up to a maximum of 0.5 ml x kg(-1) until appropriate US-guided-spread was achieved. Block duration and volumes of ropivacaine used (mean+/-1SD) in the supraclavicular approach were recorded. Success rate (mean +/- 1 SD, 95%confidence interval), complications rate and time to perform the block (two-tailed Student's test) were recorded both for supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches.
In the US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks, the duration of the sensory block was 6.5 +/- 2 h and of the motor block was 4 +/- 1 h. The volume of ropivacaine used in this group was 6 +/- 2 ml. In group I, 88% of blocks achieved surgical anaesthesia without any supplemental analgesia compared with 95% in group S (P = 0.39; difference=7%; 95% CI: -10% to 24%). Failures in group I were because of arterial puncture and insufficient ulnar or radial sensory block. Failures in group S were because of insufficient ulnar sensory block. No pneumothorax or Horner's syndrome was recorded in either group. The mean time (SD) to perform the block was in group I: 13 min (range 5-16) and in group S: 9 min (range 7-12); the 95% CI for this difference was 2-6 min and was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
(i) Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks are effective in children. (ii) There has been no pneumothorax in 40 US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks performed by anaesthesiologists already trained in US-guided regional anaesthesia using an IP technique in children > or =5 years old. (iii) In this study, the supraclavicular approach of the brachial plexus was faster to perform than the infraclavicular one.
由于存在气胸风险,锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞在儿童中并不常见。然而,锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞已在小儿患者中通过神经刺激和超声(US)引导进行了描述。超声引导可降低成人锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的并发症风险。
比较超声引导下儿童锁骨上与锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞的成功率、并发症及操作时间。
80例计划行上肢手术的5至15岁儿童被随机分为两组:S组(锁骨上组),n = 40;I组(锁骨下组),n = 40。所有阻滞均由一位具有至少6个月超声引导阻滞经验的资深麻醉医师专门在超声引导下进行。对于锁骨上阻滞,探头置于锁骨上窝的冠状斜平面,穿刺采用从外侧到内侧的平面内(IP)技术。对于锁骨下阻滞,探头平行置于锁骨下方,穿刺采用平面外技术。给予0.5%罗哌卡因,最大剂量为0.5 ml/kg(-1),直至获得合适的超声引导下扩散。记录锁骨上法的阻滞持续时间及罗哌卡因用量(均值±1标准差)。记录锁骨上和锁骨下法的成功率(均值±1标准差,95%置信区间)、并发症发生率及阻滞操作时间(双侧Student检验)。
在超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中,感觉阻滞持续时间为6.5±2小时,运动阻滞持续时间为4±1小时。该组罗哌卡因用量为6±2 ml。在I组中,88%的阻滞无需任何辅助镇痛即可达到手术麻醉效果,而S组为95%(P = 0.39;差异 = 7%;95%置信区间:-10%至24%)。I组失败原因是动脉穿刺及尺侧或桡侧感觉阻滞不足。S组失败原因是尺侧感觉阻滞不足。两组均未记录到气胸或霍纳综合征。I组阻滞操作平均时间(标准差)为13分钟(范围5 - 16分钟),S组为9分钟(范围7 - 12分钟);该差异的95%置信区间为2 - 6分钟,具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
(i)超声引导下锁骨上和锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞在儿童中是有效的。(ii)在已接受超声引导区域麻醉培训的麻醉医师对≥5岁儿童采用IP技术进行的40例超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中,未发生气胸。(iii)在本研究中,臂丛神经的锁骨上法比锁骨下法操作更快。