Suppr超能文献

如何规范评估天然抗氧化剂方法的多样性。

How to standardize the multiplicity of methods to evaluate natural antioxidants.

作者信息

Frankel Edwin N, Finley John W

机构信息

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Jul 9;56(13):4901-8. doi: 10.1021/jf800336p. Epub 2008 Jun 13.

Abstract

A great multiplicity of methods has been used to evaluate the activity of natural antioxidants by using different techniques of inducing and catalyzing oxidation and measuring the end point of oxidation for foods and biological systems. Antioxidant in vitro protocols for foods should be based on analyses at relatively low levels of oxidation under mild conditions and on the formation and decomposition of hydroperoxides. For antioxidant in vivo protocols, widely different methods have been used to test the biological protective activity of phenolic compounds. Unfortunately, many of these protocols have been based on questionable methodology to accurately measure oxidative damage and to assess relevant changes in biological targets. Many studies testing the ex vivo activity of phenolic compounds to inhibit human low-density lilpoprotein (LDL) oxidation have been difficult to evaluate because of the structural complexity of LDL particles and because a multitude of markers of oxidative damage have been used. Although studies with animal models of atherosclerosis have demonstrated the antioxidant effect of phenolic compounds in delaying the progress of this disease, human clinical trials of antioxidants have reported inconsistent and mixed results. Complex mixtures of plant polyphenols have been shown to be absorbed to varying degrees as metabolites in the intestine, but little is known about their interactions, bioavailability, and their in vivo antioxidant activity. Several metabolites identified in human plasma after consuming flavonoids need to be tested for possible nonantioxidant activities. More research and better-designed human studies are required to clarify the complex questions of bioavailability of polyphenols and the factors affecting their in vivo activities. Until we know what relevant in vivo activities to measure, any claims on the biological and health protective effects of natural polyphenolic compounds in our diet are premature.

摘要

人们已采用多种多样的方法,通过运用不同的诱导和催化氧化技术,并测定食品及生物体系的氧化终点,来评估天然抗氧化剂的活性。食品抗氧化剂的体外实验方案应基于在温和条件下相对低水平氧化时的分析,以及氢过氧化物的形成与分解。对于抗氧化剂的体内实验方案,人们已使用了广泛不同的方法来测试酚类化合物的生物保护活性。不幸的是,这些方案中有许多基于有问题的方法,难以准确测量氧化损伤并评估生物靶点的相关变化。许多测试酚类化合物体外抑制人低密度脂蛋白(LDL)氧化活性的研究,由于LDL颗粒的结构复杂性以及使用了多种氧化损伤标志物,一直难以评估。尽管对动脉粥样硬化动物模型的研究已证明酚类化合物在延缓该疾病进展方面具有抗氧化作用,但抗氧化剂的人体临床试验报告的结果却不一致且好坏参半。已表明植物多酚的复杂混合物在肠道中会以不同程度作为代谢产物被吸收,但对于它们的相互作用、生物利用度及其体内抗氧化活性却知之甚少。食用类黄酮后在人体血浆中鉴定出的几种代谢产物,需要测试其可能的非抗氧化活性。需要更多的研究和设计更完善的人体研究,以阐明多酚生物利用度的复杂问题以及影响其体内活性的因素。在我们知道要测量哪些相关的体内活性之前,对我们饮食中天然多酚化合物的生物和健康保护作用所做的任何宣称都为时过早。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验