Markstaller Klaus, Rudolph Annette, Karmrodt Jens, Gervais Hendrik W, Goetz Rolf, Becher Anja, David Matthias, Kempski Oliver S, Kauczor Hans-Ulrich, Dick Wolfgang F, Eberle Balthasar
Department of Anaesthesiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr, Mainz, Germany.
Resuscitation. 2008 Oct;79(1):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.03.228. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
The importance of ventilatory support during cardiac arrest and basic life support is controversial. This experimental study used dynamic computed tomography (CT) to assess the effects of chest compressions only during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCO-CPR) on alveolar recruitment and haemodynamic parameters in porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.
Twelve anaesthetized pigs (26+/-1 kg) were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: (1) intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) both during basic life support and advanced cardiac life support, or (2) CCO during basic life support and IPPV during advanced cardiac life support. Measurements were acquired at baseline prior to cardiac arrest, during basic life support, during advanced life support, and after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), as follows: dynamic CT series, arterial and central venous pressures, blood gases, and regional organ blood flow. The ventilated and atelectatic lung area was quantified from dynamic CT images. Differences between groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and a p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
IPPV was associated with cyclic alveolar recruitment and de-recruitment. Compared with controls, the CCO-CPR group had a significantly larger mean fractional area of atelectasis (p=0.009), and significantly lower PaO2 (p=0.002) and mean arterial pressure (p=0.023). The increase in mean atelectatic lung area observed during basic life support in the CCO-CPR group remained clinically relevant throughout the subsequent advanced cardiac life support period and following ROSC, and was associated with prolonged impaired haemodynamics. No inter-group differences in myocardial and cerebral blood flow were observed.
A lack of ventilation during basic life support is associated with excessive atelectasis, arterial hypoxaemia and compromised CPR haemodynamics. Moreover, these detrimental effects remain evident even after restoration of IPPV.
心脏骤停期间通气支持及基础生命支持的重要性存在争议。本实验研究采用动态计算机断层扫描(CT)评估在猪心室颤动模型中,心肺复苏期间仅进行胸外按压(CCO-CPR)对肺泡复张及血流动力学参数的影响。
将12只麻醉猪(26±1 kg)随机分为以下两组之一:(1)基础生命支持和高级心脏生命支持期间均采用间歇正压通气(IPPV);(2)基础生命支持期间采用CCO,高级心脏生命支持期间采用IPPV。在心脏骤停前的基线、基础生命支持期间、高级生命支持期间及自主循环恢复(ROSC)后进行测量,具体如下:动态CT序列、动脉压和中心静脉压、血气及局部器官血流。通过动态CT图像对通气肺区和肺不张区域进行定量分析。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析组间差异,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
IPPV与肺泡周期性复张和萎陷相关。与对照组相比,CCO-CPR组肺不张平均面积分数显著更大(p=0.009),动脉血氧分压(p=0.002)和平均动脉压显著更低(p=0.023)。在CCO-CPR组基础生命支持期间观察到的肺不张平均面积增加在随后的整个高级心脏生命支持期及ROSC后仍具有临床相关性,并与血流动力学长期受损相关。未观察到心肌和脑血流的组间差异。
基础生命支持期间缺乏通气与过度肺不张、动脉低氧血症及心肺复苏血流动力学受损有关。此外,即使恢复IPPV后,这些有害影响仍然明显。