Westbrook Johanna I, Coiera Enrico W, Brear Michelle, Stapleton Stuart, Rob Marilyn I, Murphy Monique, Cregan Patrick
Health Informatics Research and Evaluation Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
Med J Aust. 2008 Jun 16;188(12):704-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01850.x.
To evaluate whether introduction of an emergency department (ED) telemedicine system changed patient management and outcome indicators and to investigate clinicians' perceptions of the impact of the system on care provided and on their work.
Before-and-after study of use of the Virtual Critical Care Unit (ViCCU), which uses an ultrabroadband connection allowing real-time audiovisual communication between clinicians at distant sites. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical and nursing staff at the end of the study.
The ViCCU intervention commenced on 1 January 2004. Our study was conducted in the EDs of an 85-bed district hospital and a 420-bed metropolitan tertiary hospital. It involved all acutely ill patients requiring urgent care (defined by triage category and grouped into critical care, major trauma and moderate trauma) who were treated during the 12 months before (n=169) and 18 months after (n=181) the intervention at the district hospital. Thirty-one of 33 clinicians (doctors and nurses) participating at the two hospitals took part in interviews at the end of the study.
Changes in patterns of management (disposition [admission, discharge or transfer], treatment times, number of procedures) and outcomes (rapid acute physiology scores, hours on ventilation or in intensive care, length of stay).
Patient disposition remained unaltered for major trauma patients. For critical care patients, admissions fell significantly (54% to 30%), transfers increased (21% to 39%), and more procedures were performed. For moderate trauma patients, discharges increased significantly (45% to 63%), transfers decreased (48% to 25%) and treatment times were longer. No significant changes were found in outcome indicators. Clinicians reported that the ViCCU allowed greater support to remote clinicians. Specialists reported increased workloads and feelings of greater responsibility for patients at the district hospital. Nurses at the district site reported reduced stress, but district doctors reported some loss of autonomy.
The ViCCU appears most effective for moderate trauma patients, with associated reductions in admissions and transfers. Large-scale trials of telemedicine systems that include measurements of both patient care and impact on clinicians' work are required.
评估引入急诊科远程医疗系统是否改变了患者管理和结果指标,并调查临床医生对该系统对所提供护理及自身工作影响的看法。
对虚拟重症监护病房(ViCCU)的使用进行前后对照研究,该病房使用超宽带连接,允许远程地点的临床医生进行实时视听通信。研究结束时,对医护人员进行了半结构化访谈。
ViCCU干预于2004年1月1日开始。我们的研究在一家拥有85张床位的区级医院和一家拥有420张床位的大都市三级医院的急诊科进行。研究涉及在区级医院干预前12个月(n = 169)和干预后18个月(n = 181)期间接受治疗的所有需要紧急护理的急性病患者(根据分诊类别定义,并分为重症监护、重大创伤和中度创伤)。参与研究的两家医院的33名临床医生(医生和护士)中有31人在研究结束时参加了访谈。
管理模式(处置方式[入院、出院或转院]、治疗时间、操作数量)和结果(快速急性生理学评分、通气或重症监护时长、住院时间)的变化。
重大创伤患者的处置方式保持不变。对于重症监护患者,入院人数显著下降(从54%降至30%),转院人数增加(从21%增至39%),且进行了更多操作。对于中度创伤患者,出院人数显著增加(从45%增至63%),转院人数减少(从48%降至25%),治疗时间延长。结果指标未发现显著变化。临床医生报告称,ViCCU为远程临床医生提供了更大支持。专科医生报告工作量增加,且对区级医院患者的责任感更强。区级医院的护士报告压力减轻,但区级医生报告自主权有所丧失。
ViCCU对中度创伤患者似乎最有效,同时入院和转院人数减少。需要开展包括患者护理测量以及对临床医生工作影响测量的远程医疗系统大规模试验。