Moore Brian C J
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Trends Amplif. 2008 Jun;12(2):103-12. doi: 10.1177/1084713808317819.
Compression is used in hearing aids to compensate for the effects of loudness recruitment. This article describes the distinction between, and relative merits of, slow and fast compression systems. A study of Gatehouse and coworkers leads to the following conclusions: (a) The benefit from compression is greatest among individuals who experience a wide range of sound levels within short periods of time, (b) slow compression generally leads to higher listening comfort than fast compression, (c) the benefit from fast compression varies across individuals, and those with high cognitive ability are able to benefit from fast compression to take advantage of temporal dips in a background sound. It is argued that listening in the dips depends on the ability to process the temporal fine structure of sounds. It is proposed that a test of the ability to process temporal fine structure might be useful for selecting compression speed for an individual.
压缩被用于助听器中以补偿响度重振的影响。本文描述了慢速和快速压缩系统之间的区别以及相对优点。盖特豪斯及其同事的一项研究得出了以下结论:(a)在短时间内经历广泛声级范围的个体中,压缩带来的益处最大;(b)慢速压缩通常比快速压缩带来更高的聆听舒适度;(c)快速压缩带来的益处因人而异,认知能力高的人能够从快速压缩中受益,以利用背景声音中的时间间隙。有人认为,在间隙中聆听取决于处理声音时间精细结构的能力。有人提议,对处理时间精细结构能力的测试可能有助于为个体选择压缩速度。