Conte Mary M, Victor Jonathan D
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Vision Res. 2009 May;49(9):898-906. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.030. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
We extend Spekreijse's strategy for analyzing lateral interactions in visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to clinical neurophysiologic testing of patients with epilepsy. Stimuli consisted of the radial windmill/dartboard pattern [Ratliff, F., & Zemon, V. (1982). Some new methods for the analysis of lateral interactions that influence the visual evoked potential. In: Bodis-Wollner (Ed.), Evoked potentials, Vol. 388. (pp. 113-124). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.] and conventional checkerboards. The fundamental and 2nd-harmonic components of the steady-state responses were used to calculate indices reflecting facilitatory (FI) and suppressive (SI) cortical interactions. We carried out two studies. In the first, VEPs in 38 patients receiving antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy were compared to those of age-matched controls. For three AEDs (tiagabine, topiramate, and felbamate), addition of the drug did not change the FI and SI compared to baseline values or those of normal controls. However, the addition of gabapentin was associated with an increase of the FI, and this change was reversed when the medication was withdrawn. This suggested a medication-specific change in cortical lateral interactions. The second study focused on the effects of neurostimulation therapy. Eleven epilepsy patients receiving chronic vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) treatment were tested. By comparing VEPs recorded with the stimulator on (Stim-ON) and turned off (Stim-OFF) in the same session, we determined that VNS did not have a short-acting effect on lateral interactions. However, when compared with normal controls, the VNS patients had a significantly smaller SI (p<.05), but no difference in the FI, demonstrating the presence of a chronic effect. We conclude that with the appropriate stimuli, VEPs can be used as a measure of cortical lateral interactions in normals and epileptic patients, and demonstrate specific changes in these interactions associated with certain treatment modalities.
我们将斯佩克赖伊斯(Spekreijse)分析视觉诱发电位(VEP)中侧向相互作用的策略扩展到癫痫患者的临床神经生理学测试。刺激包括径向风车/飞镖靶图案[拉特利夫(Ratliff),F.,& 泽蒙(Zemon),V.(1982年)。一些用于分析影响视觉诱发电位的侧向相互作用的新方法。载于:博迪斯 - 沃尔纳(Bodis - Wollner)(编),《诱发电位》,第388卷。(第113 - 124页)。纽约:纽约科学院年报。]和传统棋盘格。稳态反应的基波和二次谐波成分用于计算反映促进性(FI)和抑制性(SI)皮质相互作用的指标。我们进行了两项研究。第一项研究中,将38例接受抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗的患者的VEP与年龄匹配的对照组进行比较。对于三种AED(替加宾、托吡酯和非氨酯),与基线值或正常对照组相比,添加药物后FI和SI没有变化。然而,添加加巴喷丁与FI增加相关,停药后这种变化逆转。这表明皮质侧向相互作用存在药物特异性变化。第二项研究聚焦于神经刺激疗法的效果。对11例接受慢性迷走神经刺激(VNS)治疗的癫痫患者进行了测试。通过比较在同一时段刺激器开启(刺激开启)和关闭(刺激关闭)时记录的VEP,我们确定VNS对侧向相互作用没有短期影响。然而,与正常对照组相比,VNS患者的SI显著更小(p <.05),但FI没有差异,表明存在慢性影响。我们得出结论,使用适当的刺激,VEP可作为正常人和癫痫患者皮质侧向相互作用的一种测量方法,并证明这些相互作用与某些治疗方式相关的特定变化。