Paepe Dominique, Smets Pascale, van Hoek Ingrid, Saunders Jimmy, Duchateau Luc, Daminet Sylvie
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Small Animal Medicine and Clinical Biology, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
J Feline Med Surg. 2008 Dec;10(6):558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
Thyroid gland palpation is an important aid for diagnosing feline hyperthyroidism in an early stage to prevent development of deleterious complications. Our objectives were to assess within- and between-examiner agreement for two thyroid gland palpation techniques in cats and to correlate palpation results with ultrasonographic thyroid measurements. Nine client-owned hyperthyroid (12.6 +/- 2.4 years) and 10 healthy control cats (7.4 +/- 5.4 years) entered this prospective study. Both thyroid glands of all cats were palpated twice by three blindfolded clinicians with the classic palpation technique [technique 1 (T1)] and the technique described by Norsworthy GD, Adams VJ, McElhaney MR, Milios JA [(2002a) Relationship between semi-quantitative thyroid palpation and total thyroxine concentration in cats with and without hyperthyroidism. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 4, 139-143] [technique 2 (T2)]. A semi-quantitative score from 1 to 6 was assigned to the gland size. After clipping of the ventral cervical region, another palpation session followed by ultrasonography of the thyroid glands was performed. Average weighted kappa-values within- and between-examiners were 0.864 and 0.644 for T1 and 0.732 and 0.532 for T2. T1 did lead to significantly smaller within- (P=0.007) and between-examiner (P=0.048) differences than T2. Significant correlation coefficients (P<0.001) between the palpation scores of both techniques and ultrasonographic thyroid lobe length (T1: 0.43; T2: 0.38) were observed. No significant difference before and after clipping was found (T1: P=0.503; T2: P=0.607). The first time that all cats were palpated by either technique, significant score differences between control and hyperthyroid cats were observed both for T1 (P=0.002) and T2 (P=0.003). Both feline thyroid gland palpation techniques have good within- and between-examiner agreements. Based on this study, the classic palpation technique is preferred.
甲状腺触诊是早期诊断猫甲状腺功能亢进以预防有害并发症发生的一项重要辅助手段。我们的目标是评估猫的两种甲状腺触诊技术在检查者内部和检查者之间的一致性,并将触诊结果与甲状腺超声测量结果进行关联。九只客户拥有的甲状腺功能亢进猫(12.6±2.4岁)和十只健康对照猫(7.4±5.4岁)进入了这项前瞻性研究。所有猫的双侧甲状腺均由三名蒙眼的临床医生分别采用经典触诊技术[技术1(T1)]和Norsworthy GD、Adams VJ、McElhaney MR、Milios JA所描述的技术[(2002a)甲状腺功能亢进和非甲状腺功能亢进猫的半定量甲状腺触诊与总甲状腺素浓度之间的关系。《猫医学与外科学杂志》4,139 - 143][技术2(T2)]进行两次触诊。根据腺体大小赋予1至6的半定量评分。在剪去颈部腹侧区域毛发后,接着进行另一次触诊,随后对甲状腺进行超声检查。对于T1,检查者内部和检查者之间的平均加权kappa值分别为0.864和0.644,对于T2则分别为0.732和0.532。与T2相比,T1导致的检查者内部差异(P = 0.007)和检查者之间差异(P = 0.048)显著更小。观察到两种技术的触诊评分与甲状腺超声叶长度之间存在显著的相关系数(P < 0.001)(T1:0.43;T2:0.38)。剪毛前后未发现显著差异(T1:P = 0.503;T2:P = 0.607)。首次采用任何一种技术对所有猫进行触诊时,T1(P = 0.002)和T2(P = 0.003)在对照猫和甲状腺功能亢进猫之间均观察到显著的评分差异。两种猫甲状腺触诊技术在检查者内部和检查者之间均具有良好的一致性。基于本研究,首选经典触诊技术。