Newcomer John W, Campos Joao Alberto, Marcus Ronald N, Breder Christopher, Berman Robert M, Kerselaers Wendy, L'italien Gilbert J, Nys Marleen, Carson William H, McQuade Robert D
Department of Psychiatry, Psychology and Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;69(7):1046-56. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0702.
Major mental disorders are associated with an increased risk for obesity-related cardiovascular mortality, leading to interest in risk-reduction approaches that target weight and risk-related plasma lipids, including use of antipsychotic agents with low metabolic risk. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the metabolic effects of aripiprazole versus olanzapine in overweight persons with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were previously on olanzapine treatment.
In total, 173 subjects with DSM-IV-TR-defined schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to receive aripiprazole (N = 88) or olanzapine (N = 85) for 16 weeks in a study conducted from March 30, 2004, to August 8, 2006. Primary and secondary endpoints were mean weight change from baseline and percentage change from baseline in fasting triglyceride levels, respectively.
At week 16, weight decreased significantly with aripiprazole versus olanzapine (-1.8 vs. +1.41 kg; p < .001). Significant differences in percentage change in triglyceride levels were observed with aripiprazole (decreases) versus olanzapine (increases) at all time-points. In addition, significantly more subjects receiving aripiprazole had clinically relevant (> or = 7%) weight loss versus olanzapine (11.1% vs. 2.6%; p = .038), and a lower percentage of subjects receiving aripiprazole had clinically relevant weight gain (2.5% vs. 9.1%; p = .082). Mean percentage changes in fasting total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at week 16 were significantly different with aripiprazole versus olanzapine, with no significant effects on glycemic laboratory measures. Mean Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scores for both groups were in the range of "no change" to "minimal improvement." CGI-I endpoint scores were statistically significantly better with olanzapine (mean +/- SE = 3.09 +/- 0.16) versus aripiprazole (mean +/- SE = 3.74 +/- 0.15; p < .001), and more subjects discontinued aripiprazole (N = 32/88; 36%) than olanzapine (N = 22/85; 26%).
Significant improvements in weight and lipids observed during discontinuation of olanzapine and switch to aripiprazole treatment occurred with limited evidence of negative psychiatric effects, relative to uninterrupted continuation of olanzapine treatment. The results suggest that the potential value of therapeutic substitutions involving specific antipsychotic medications should be considered in overall efforts to reduce cardiovascular risk in this population.
重度精神障碍与肥胖相关心血管疾病死亡率增加有关,这引发了人们对针对体重及与风险相关的血浆脂质的降低风险方法的兴趣,包括使用具有低代谢风险的抗精神病药物。这项多中心、随机、双盲研究比较了阿立哌唑与奥氮平对既往接受奥氮平治疗的超重精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的代谢影响。
在2004年3月30日至2006年8月8日进行的一项研究中,总共173名符合DSM-IV-TR标准的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者被随机分配接受阿立哌唑(N = 88)或奥氮平(N = 85)治疗16周。主要和次要终点分别是自基线起的平均体重变化以及空腹甘油三酯水平相对于基线的百分比变化。
在第16周时,与奥氮平相比,阿立哌唑使体重显著下降(-1.8 vs. +1.41 kg;p <.001)。在所有时间点,阿立哌唑(降低)与奥氮平(升高)在甘油三酯水平百分比变化方面存在显著差异。此外,与奥氮平相比,接受阿立哌唑治疗且体重临床相关减轻(≥7%)的受试者显著更多(11.1% vs. 2.6%;p =.038),而接受阿立哌唑治疗且体重临床相关增加的受试者百分比更低(2.5% vs. 9.1%;p =.082)。在第16周时,阿立哌唑与奥氮平相比,空腹总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的平均百分比变化显著不同,对血糖实验室指标无显著影响。两组的平均临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)评分处于“无变化”至“轻微改善”范围内。奥氮平的CGI-I终点评分在统计学上显著优于阿立哌唑(均值±标准误 = 3.09 ± 0.16)与阿立哌唑(均值±标准误 = 3.74 ± 0.15;p <.001),并且停用阿立哌唑的受试者(N = 32/88;36%)比停用奥氮平的受试者(N = 22/85;26%)更多。
与持续使用奥氮平治疗相比,在停用奥氮平并换用阿立哌唑治疗期间,体重和血脂有显著改善,且负面精神效应证据有限。结果表明,在降低该人群心血管风险的总体努力中,应考虑涉及特定抗精神病药物的治疗替代的潜在价值。