Howell Ryan T, Howell Colleen J
Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;134(4):536-60. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.536.
The current research synthesis integrates the findings of 111 independent samples from 54 economically developing countries that examined the relation between economic status and subjective well-being (SWB). The average economic status-SWB effect size was strongest among low-income developing economies (r = .28) and for samples that were least educated (r = .36). The relation was weakest among high-income developing economies (r = .10) and for highly educated samples (r = .13). Controlling for numerous covariates, the partial r effect size remained significant for the least-educated samples (pr = .18). Moderator analyses showed the economic status-SWB relation to be strongest when (a) economic status was defined as wealth (a stock variable), instead of as income (a flow variable), and (b) SWB was measured as life satisfaction (a cognitive assessment), instead of as happiness (an emotional assessment). Findings were replicated with a meta-analysis of the World Values Survey data. Discussion centers on the plausibility of need theory, alternative explanations of results, interpretation of moderators, and directions for future research.
当前的研究综述整合了来自54个经济发展中国家的111个独立样本的研究结果,这些样本考察了经济状况与主观幸福感(SWB)之间的关系。平均经济状况与主观幸福感的效应量在低收入发展中经济体中最强(r = 0.28),在受教育程度最低的样本中也最强(r = 0.36)。在高收入发展中经济体中这种关系最弱(r = 0.10),在受过高等教育的样本中也是如此(r = 0.13)。在控制了众多协变量后,受教育程度最低的样本的偏r效应量仍然显著(pr = 0.18)。调节分析表明,当(a)经济状况被定义为财富(一个存量变量)而非收入(一个流量变量),以及(b)主观幸福感被衡量为生活满意度(一种认知评估)而非幸福感(一种情感评估)时,经济状况与主观幸福感的关系最强。研究结果通过对世界价值观调查数据的元分析得到了重复验证。讨论集中在需求理论的合理性、结果的替代解释、调节因素的解释以及未来研究的方向上。