Suppr超能文献

英国伍尔弗汉普顿新十字医院对头颈部癌进行根治性放疗时同步每周一次与每三周一次顺铂给药的剂量强度比较:一项回顾性比较

Dose intensity comparison between weekly and 3-weekly Cisplatin delivered concurrently with radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a retrospective comparison from New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.

作者信息

Ho Kean F, Swindell Ric, Brammer Caroline V

机构信息

Deansley Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2008;47(8):1513-8. doi: 10.1080/02841860701846160.

Abstract

AIMS

In this retrospective comparison, we describe the differences in dose intensity, delays and toxicity between weekly Cisplatin and 3-weekly Cisplatin given concurrently to patients with locally advanced squamous head and neck cancer (SCCHN) at New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients received radical Cisplatin based chemoradiotherapy for stage 4a SCCHN of the head and neck between September 2000 and December 2004. Twenty-seven patients were treated with 3-weekly inpatient Cisplatin for 3 cycles (20 patients-80 mg/m(2); 7 patients-100 mg/m(2)) concomitantly with radiotherapy (66-70 Gy/33-35 fractions). Twenty-four patients received a similar radiotherapy schedule but received weekly Cisplatin 33-40 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

More patients received a higher cumulative dose of at least 240 mg/m(2) if given weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) or 3-weekly Cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) compared with those receiving Cisplatin 3-weekly 100 mg/m(2) (p=0.04). Maximum cumulative dose achievable in the latter group was only 200 mg/m(2) and none achieved the full 3 cycles. Mean Cisplatin dose in the weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) regime (mean 202 mg/m(2)) and 3-weekly arm of 80 mg/m(2) (mean 203 mg/m(2)) was higher than that reached if given 3-weekly Cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (mean 180 mg/m(2)) although statistically insignificant (p=0.39) due to the small number of patients. More delays (29% vs. 41%) and omission of chemotherapy (5.6% vs. 17.4%) occurred in the 3-weekly compared with the weekly regime. Toxicity, radiotherapy overall treatment time and delays were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Delivery of 100 mg/m(2) Cisplatin 3-weekly with radiotherapy was less tolerated than 40 mg/m(2) weekly and resulted in less patients achieving cumulative dose beyond 200 mg/m(2), potentially lowering chemotherapy dose intensity.

摘要

目的

在这项回顾性比较中,我们描述了伍尔弗汉普顿新十字医院对局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)患者同时给予每周一次顺铂和每三周一次顺铂时,在剂量强度、治疗延迟和毒性方面的差异。

材料与方法

2000年9月至2004年12月期间,51例患者接受了基于顺铂的根治性放化疗,用于治疗头颈部4a期SCCHN。27例患者接受每三周一次的住院顺铂治疗,共3个周期(20例患者 - 80mg/m²;7例患者 - 100mg/m²),同时进行放疗(66 - 70Gy/33 - 35次分割)。24例患者接受类似的放疗方案,但接受每周一次的顺铂33 - 40mg/m²。

结果

与接受每三周一次100mg/m²顺铂的患者相比,接受每周一次40mg/m²顺铂或每三周一次80mg/m²顺铂的患者中,更多患者接受了至少240mg/m²的更高累积剂量(p = 0.04)。后一组可达到的最大累积剂量仅为200mg/m²,且无人完成全部3个周期。每周一次40mg/m²顺铂方案(平均202mg/m²)和每三周一次80mg/m²组的平均顺铂剂量高于每三周一次100mg/m²组(平均180mg/m²),尽管由于患者数量少,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.39)。与每周方案相比,每三周方案出现更多的治疗延迟(29%对41%)和化疗遗漏(分别为5.6%和17.4%)。两组之间的毒性、放疗总治疗时间和延迟情况相似。

结论

每三周一次给予100mg/m²顺铂联合放疗的耐受性低于每周一次给予40mg/m²顺铂,导致达到累积剂量超过200mg/m²的患者更少,这可能降低了化疗剂量强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验