Bond G Randall
Drug and Poison Information Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009 Jan;47(1):2-7. doi: 10.1080/15563650801941831.
Significant controversy surrounds the clinical and legal implications of 3-para cysteinyl acetaminophen, the protein degradation product of acetaminophen protein adducts. Versions of this test have been used for several years in animal research to help understand acetaminophen toxicity. As human research papers have appeared, the allegation has been made that the presence of 3-para cysteinyl acetaminophen in a patient with hepatic injury proves causal association of acetaminophen with the injury. It has also been suggested that quantitative adduct assays can guide the management of acute overdose or repeated supra-therapeutic use of acetaminophen by determining the need for initiating therapy and the timing of the end of therapy. The purpose of this review is to discuss the nature of this molecule and the detection assay, the animal research linking it with injury, and to evaluate the human research--specifically the evidence regarding causality and clinical utility. At the current time there is inadequate evidence for the test alone to prove causal association between acetaminophen and hepatic injury. Also, since quantitative 3-para cysteinyl acetaminophen assays parallel other markers of liver injury, it is not clear that assays alone will guide therapy unless quantitative assay markers can be shown to precede other markers (in elevation or decline) or provide more specificity than the Rumack-Matthew risk categorization nomogram. These advantages have not been demonstrated.
对乙酰氨基酚蛋白质加合物的蛋白质降解产物——3-对-半胱氨酰对乙酰氨基酚的临床和法律意义存在重大争议。该检测方法的多个版本已在动物研究中使用多年,以帮助了解对乙酰氨基酚的毒性。随着人类研究论文的出现,有人声称肝损伤患者体内存在3-对-半胱氨酰对乙酰氨基酚可证明对乙酰氨基酚与该损伤存在因果关系。也有人提出,定量加合物检测可通过确定启动治疗的必要性和治疗结束的时间来指导对乙酰氨基酚急性过量或反复超治疗剂量使用的管理。本综述的目的是讨论该分子的性质和检测方法、将其与损伤联系起来的动物研究,并评估人类研究——特别是关于因果关系和临床实用性的证据。目前,仅靠该检测方法不足以证明对乙酰氨基酚与肝损伤之间存在因果关系。此外,由于3-对-半胱氨酰对乙酰氨基酚定量检测与其他肝损伤标志物平行,除非定量检测标志物能够先于其他标志物(升高或下降)出现,或者比鲁马克-马修风险分类列线图具有更高的特异性,否则仅靠检测是否能指导治疗尚不清楚。这些优势尚未得到证实。