Suppr超能文献

距离重要吗?全科医生非工作时间服务使用情况的地理差异:一项观察性研究。

Does distance matter? Geographical variation in GP out-of-hours service use: an observational study.

作者信息

Turnbull Joanne, Martin David, Lattimer Val, Pope Catherine, Culliford David

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Jul;58(552):471-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319431.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GP cooperatives are typically based in emergency primary care centres, and patients are frequently required to travel to be seen. Geography is a key determinant of access, but little is known about the extent of geographical variation in the use of out-of-hours services.

AIM

To examine the effects of distance and rurality on rates of out-of-hours service use.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Geographical analysis based on routinely collected data on telephone calls in June (n=14 482) and December (n=19 747), and area-level data.

SETTING

Out-of-hours provider in Devon, England serving nearly 1 million patients.

METHOD

Straight-line distance measured patients' proximity to the primary care centre. At area level, rurality was measured by Office for National Statistics Rural and Urban Classification (2004) for output areas, and deprivation by The Index of Multiple Deprivation (2004).

RESULTS

Call rates decreased with increasing distance: 172 (95% confidence interval [CI]=170 to 175) for the first (nearest) distance quintile, 162 (95% CI=159 to 165) for the second, and 159 (95% CI=156 to 162) per thousand patients/year for the third quintile. Distance and deprivation predicted call rate. Rates were highest for urban areas and lowest for sparse villages and hamlets. The greatest urban/rural variation was in patients aged 0-4 years. Rates were higher in deprived areas, but the effect of deprivation was more evident in urban than rural areas.

CONCLUSION

There is geographical variation in out-of-hours service use. Patients from rural areas have lower call rates, but deprivation appears to be a greater determinant in urban areas. Geographical barriers must be taken into account when planning and delivering services.

摘要

背景

全科医生合作社通常设在紧急初级保健中心,患者常常需要前往就诊。地理位置是影响就诊机会的关键因素,但关于非工作时间服务使用的地理差异程度,人们了解甚少。

目的

研究距离和乡村属性对非工作时间服务使用率的影响。

研究设计

基于6月(n = 14482)和12月(n = 19747)常规收集的电话数据以及区域层面数据进行地理分析。

研究地点

英格兰德文郡的非工作时间服务提供者,服务近100万患者。

方法

直线距离用于衡量患者与初级保健中心的接近程度。在区域层面,乡村属性通过国家统计局的农村和城市分类(2004年)对输出区域进行衡量,贫困程度通过多重贫困指数(2004年)进行衡量。

结果

呼叫率随距离增加而下降:第一个(最近的)距离五分位数为每千名患者/年172次(95%置信区间[CI] = 170至175),第二个为162次(95%CI = 159至165),第三个五分位数为159次(95%CI = 156至162)。距离和贫困程度可预测呼叫率。城市地区的呼叫率最高,稀疏村庄和小村庄的呼叫率最低。0至4岁患者的城乡差异最大。贫困地区的呼叫率较高,但贫困在城市地区的影响比农村地区更为明显。

结论

非工作时间服务的使用存在地理差异。农村地区的患者呼叫率较低,但贫困在城市地区似乎是一个更大的决定因素。在规划和提供服务时,必须考虑地理障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验