Grote Tobias, Siwak Doris R, Fritsche Herbert A, Joy Corwin, Mills Gordon B, Simeone Diane, Whitcomb David C, Logsdon Craig D
Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Proteomics. 2008 Aug;8(15):3051-60. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700951.
The current study analyzed reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) as a means to experimentally validate biomarkers in blood samples. One microliter samples of sera (n = 71), and plasma (n = 78) were serially diluted and printed on NC-coated slides. CA19-9 levels from RPPA results were compared with identical patient samples as measured by ELISA. There was a strong correlation between RPPA and ELISA (r = 0.87) as determined by scatter plots. Sample reproducibility of CA19-9 levels was excellent (interslide correlation r = 0.88; intraslide correlation r = 0.83). The ability of RPPA to accurately distinguish CA19-9 levels between cancer and noncancer samples were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves and compared with ELISA. The AUC for RPPA and ELISA was comparable (0.87 and 0.86, respectively). When the mean CA19-9 levels of normal samples was used as a cutoff for RPPA and compared with the standard clinical ELISA cutoff, comparable specificities (71% for both) were observed. Notably, RPPA samples normalized to albumin showed increased sensitivity compared to ELISA (90% vs. 75%). As RPPA is a high-throughput method that shows results comparable to that of ELISA, we propose that RPPA is a viable technique for rapid experimental screening and validation of candidate biomarkers in blood samples.
本研究分析了反向蛋白质阵列(RPPA),以此作为实验验证血液样本中生物标志物的一种手段。将1微升血清样本(n = 71)和血浆样本(n = 78)进行系列稀释,并印在硝酸纤维素包被的载玻片上。将RPPA结果中的CA19-9水平与通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)测量的相同患者样本进行比较。通过散点图确定,RPPA与ELISA之间存在强相关性(r = 0.87)。CA19-9水平的样本重现性极佳(玻片间相关性r = 0.88;玻片内相关性r = 0.83)。使用受试者工作特征曲线确定RPPA准确区分癌症样本和非癌症样本中CA19-9水平的能力,并与ELISA进行比较。RPPA和ELISA的曲线下面积(AUC)相当(分别为0.87和0.86)。当将正常样本的平均CA19-9水平用作RPPA的临界值,并与标准临床ELISA临界值进行比较时,观察到相当的特异性(两者均为71%)。值得注意的是,与ELISA相比,以白蛋白标准化的RPPA样本显示出更高的灵敏度(90%对75%)。由于RPPA是一种高通量方法,其结果与ELISA相当,我们认为RPPA是一种用于快速实验筛选和验证血液样本中候选生物标志物的可行技术。