Suppr超能文献

混合模拟器生成的指标与内容有效的结果测量指标相关吗?

Do hybrid simulator-generated metrics correlate with content-valid outcome measures?

作者信息

Cesanek Paul, Uchal Miroslav, Uranues Selman, Patruno Joseph, Gogal Christina, Kimmel Sharon, Bergamaschi Roberto

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Cedar Crest & I-78, P.O. Box 689, Allentown, PA 18105-1556, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2178-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0018-6. Epub 2008 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hybrid simulators provide objective metrics for laparoscopic task performance. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between hybrid simulator-generated metrics and content-valid outcome measures.

METHODS

Residents underwent training with a previously validated 5-task simulation model (5-TSM). The resident tasks included vessel clipping and dividing, lesion excision, loop appendectomy, mesh placement with tacks, and suture perforation with intracorporeal knot tying. After training, the residents were tested using the open module of a hybrid simulator (ProMIS) with previously validated passing scores. Content validity was defined as the extent to which outcome measures departed from clinical reality. Content-valid outcome measures (accuracy error, knot slippage, leak, operating time, tissue damage) were evaluated by two blinded raters. The hybrid simulator-generated metrics were path length and smoothness of movements. Values are given as means (standard deviation is not shown).

RESULTS

Over 23 months, 20 residents underwent training with 5-TSM. Respectively, for tasks 1 to 5, the path length was 3,895, 3,472, 4,620, 2,408, and 9,089 mm; the smoothness (jerk) was 346, 455, 549, 264, and 910 cm/sec3; the accuracy error was 0.45, 2.20, 0.55, 0.87, and 0.20 mm; and the knot slippage was 5%. There were no leaks. The operating time, respectively, was 54, 61, 135, 43, and 130 s, and the tissue damage was 0, 0.28, 0, 0.8, and 0 mm. The interrater reliability was more than 0.80 for all the outcome measures except accuracy error (k=0.52). There was correlation between path length and operating time (Spearman rho, 0.537-0.709; p<0.05) for all the tasks. There was no correlation between path length and accuracy error, knot slippage, leak, and tissue damage. No correlation was found between smoothness and any of the outcome measures for any of the tasks except operating time (Spearman rho, 0.762-0.958; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although an expected strong correlation was observed between hybrid simulator-generated metrics and operating time, this study showed no correlation between simulator-generated metrics and other content-valid outcome measures.

摘要

背景

混合模拟器可为腹腔镜任务表现提供客观指标。本研究旨在评估混合模拟器生成的指标与内容效度结果测量之间的相关性。

方法

住院医师使用先前验证过的5任务模拟模型(5 - TSM)进行培训。住院医师的任务包括血管夹闭与离断、病变切除、环形阑尾切除术、用钉固定补片以及体内打结的缝合穿孔。培训后,使用具有先前验证过的及格分数的混合模拟器(ProMIS)开放模块对住院医师进行测试。内容效度定义为结果测量偏离临床实际的程度。由两名盲法评分者评估内容效度结果测量(准确性误差、结滑脱、渗漏、手术时间、组织损伤)。混合模拟器生成的指标为运动路径长度和平滑度。数值以均值表示(未显示标准差)。

结果

在23个月期间,20名住院医师使用5 - TSM进行了培训。对于任务1至5,路径长度分别为3895、3472、4620、2408和9089毫米;平滑度(加加速度)分别为346、455、549、264和910厘米/秒³;准确性误差分别为0.45、2.20、0.55、0.87和0.20毫米;结滑脱率为5%。无渗漏发生。手术时间分别为54、61、135、43和130秒,组织损伤分别为0、0.28、0、0.8和0毫米。除准确性误差(κ = 0.52)外,所有结果测量的评分者间信度均超过0.80。所有任务的路径长度与手术时间之间均存在相关性(Spearman相关系数,0.537 - 0.709;p < 0.05)。路径长度与准确性误差、结滑脱、渗漏及组织损伤之间无相关性。除手术时间外(Spearman相关系数,0.762 - 0.958;p < 0.05),平滑度与任何任务的任何结果测量之间均无相关性。

结论

尽管观察到混合模拟器生成的指标与手术时间之间存在预期的强相关性,但本研究表明模拟器生成的指标与其他内容效度结果测量之间无相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验