Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Social Medicine and Public Health Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Oct;19(5):627-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00820.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
Physical activity referral (PAR) schemes or concepts occur in varying forms. Because few physical activity intervention studies have been carried out in routine health care settings, it is difficult to translate research findings into daily practice. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of a PAR scheme implemented in routine primary health care. The study did not include a control group and was based on the ordinary staff's work efforts and follow-up measures. During a 2-year period, 6300 PARs were issued. Effectiveness was measured by an increase in self-reported physical activity. Half of the patients reached reported increased physical activity both at 3 months (49%) and at 12 months (52%). The proportion of inactive patients decreased from 33% at baseline to 17% at 3 months and 20% at 12 months. The proportion of patients who were physically active on a regular basis increased from 22% at baseline to 33% at 3 months and 32% at 12 months. Neither the patient's age nor the profession of the prescriber was associated with differences in effectiveness. The patient's activity level at baseline, the type of physical activity as well as the reason for the prescription were associated with increased physical activity.
身体活动推荐(PAR)方案或概念以不同的形式存在。由于很少有身体活动干预研究在常规医疗保健环境中进行,因此将研究结果转化为日常实践是困难的。本研究的目的是分析在常规初级保健中实施的 PAR 方案的有效性。该研究没有对照组,并且基于普通员工的工作努力和后续措施。在两年期间,共发放了 6300 份 PAR。有效性通过自我报告的身体活动增加来衡量。有一半的患者在 3 个月(49%)和 12 个月(52%)时报告了增加的身体活动。不活动患者的比例从基线时的 33%下降到 3 个月时的 17%和 12 个月时的 20%。基线时定期进行身体活动的患者比例从 22%增加到 3 个月时的 33%和 12 个月时的 32%。患者的年龄和开处方者的职业都与效果差异无关。患者的基线活动水平、身体活动类型以及处方的原因与身体活动增加有关。