Helmhout Pieter H, Staal J Bart, Maher Chris G, Petersen Tom, Rainville James, Shaw William S
Training Medicine and Training Physiology Team, Occupational Health and Safety Service, Royal Netherlands Army, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 15;33(16):1782-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8fd6.
A report on plenary presentations and discussions of an expert panel and workshop ("Exercise as a treatment for subacute low back pain") that was held at the Amsterdam Forum VIII on Low Back Pain Research in Primary Care.
To highlight important issues regarding the design, conduct, and reporting of exercise trials and to provide suggestions for improvement in each domain.
Despite improvements in the methodologic quality of randomized clinical trials on low back pain (LBP), current trials on exercise therapy still show methodologic flaws in the design and reporting of studies.
Important issues in the design, conduct, and reporting of exercise trials for LBP were introduced by 4 presenters, and this was followed by a group discussion among 40 attendees. Conclusions and recommendations were extracted by the workshop panelists and summarized in this paper. RESULTS.: Workshop discussion led to the following recommendations: (1) specify a theoretical framework for exercise therapy for designing the intervention and selecting appropriate treatment efficacy measures; (2) to overcome blinding problems in exercise trials, include sham interventions and assess the success of blinding; (3) evaluate the role of patient-provider interactions through the use of self-report or observational measures; (4) to assure quality of treatment, use exercise interventions that reference existing exercise guidelines; (5) use subgroup analyses to identify subgroups of patients most likely to benefit; (6) in reporting exercise trials, include an extensive description of the study population, a detailed exercise protocol, and some measure of patient compliance; (7) further categorization of exercise interventions is needed, in terms of concept, mode, intensity, duration, frequency, and length; and (8) trial;1>registration and publication of detailed study protocols may help to strengthen the evidence-based concerning exercise therapy for LBP.
By paying proper attention to issues concerning the design and reporting of exercise protocols when conducting future exercise trials, research may provide a stronger evidence basis for recommending or not recommending various exercise therapies for LBP.
一份关于在阿姆斯特丹初级保健腰痛研究论坛 VIII 上举行的专家小组和研讨会(“运动作为亚急性腰痛的治疗方法”)全会报告。
强调运动试验设计、实施和报告方面的重要问题,并为每个领域的改进提供建议。
尽管腰痛随机临床试验的方法学质量有所提高,但目前的运动疗法试验在研究设计和报告方面仍存在方法学缺陷。
4 位演讲者介绍了腰痛运动试验设计、实施和报告中的重要问题,随后 40 名与会者进行了小组讨论。研讨会小组成员提取了结论和建议并总结在本文中。结果:研讨会讨论得出以下建议:(1)为运动疗法指定一个理论框架,以设计干预措施并选择合适的治疗效果评估指标;(2)为克服运动试验中的盲法问题,包括采用假干预措施并评估盲法的成功性;(3)通过自我报告或观察性测量评估患者与提供者互动的作用;(4)为确保治疗质量,采用参考现有运动指南的运动干预措施;(5)使用亚组分析来确定最可能受益的患者亚组;(6)在报告运动试验时,包括对研究人群的详细描述、详细的运动方案以及患者依从性的某种测量;(7)需要根据概念、方式、强度、持续时间、频率和时长对运动干预措施进行进一步分类;(8)试验;1>详细研究方案的注册和发表可能有助于加强关于腰痛运动疗法的循证依据。
在未来进行运动试验时,适当关注运动方案的设计和报告问题,研究可能会为推荐或不推荐各种腰痛运动疗法提供更强有力的循证依据。