Suppr超能文献

意图形成的策略反映在连续的 MEG 活动中。

Strategies of intention formation are reflected in continuous MEG activity.

机构信息

University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(1):11-27. doi: 10.1080/17470910801925350.

Abstract

Self-regulation of intention formation is pivotal for achieving behavior change. Fantasy realization theory (Oettingen, 2000) assumes that mentally contrasting a desired positive future with present negative reality turns high expectations of success into strong intentions to realize the desired future, while indulging in the positive future fails to do so. The present study tests the theory's process assumption that mental contrasting is a cognitively demanding, purposeful problem-solving strategy involving working and episodic memory, whereas indulging is a mindless daydreaming strategy involving the free flow of thought, by investigating the neural correlates of the two strategies via continuous magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activity. We observed greater activity during mental contrasting (but not indulging) compared to resting in prefrontal, frontal, parietal, and temporal areas, indicating that mental contrasting involves strong intention formation, working memory, and episodic memory. In addition, heightened activity of occipital areas was observed during mental contrasting compared to resting and indulging, suggesting that mental contrasting, more than indulging and resting, entails purposefully creating mental images. Taken together, these findings indicate that mental contrasting is indeed a purposeful problem-solving strategy based on past performance history, whereas indulging is a purposeless daydreaming strategy that is oblivious to past experiences.

摘要

自我调节意图形成对于实现行为改变至关重要。幻想实现理论(Oettingen,2000)假设,通过心理对比理想的积极未来与当前的消极现实,可以将对成功的高期望转化为实现理想未来的强烈意愿,而沉迷于积极的未来则无法实现。本研究通过连续脑磁图(MEG)活动来测试该理论的过程假设,即心理对比是一种认知要求高、有目的的问题解决策略,涉及工作记忆和情景记忆,而沉迷是一种无意识的白日梦策略,涉及自由联想,以此来研究两种策略的神经相关性。我们观察到在心理对比(而非沉迷)期间,与休息相比,前额叶、额叶、顶叶和颞叶区域的活动增加,这表明心理对比涉及强烈的意图形成、工作记忆和情景记忆。此外,与休息和沉迷相比,在心理对比期间观察到枕叶区域的活动增加,这表明心理对比比沉迷和休息更需要有目的地创造心理意象。综上所述,这些发现表明,心理对比确实是一种基于过去表现的有目的的问题解决策略,而沉迷则是一种无意识的白日梦策略,对过去的经验漠不关心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验