McCann Melanie
St Georges Hospital, London.
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(7):428, 430-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.7.29061.
Lymphoedema and chronic venous insufficiency with venous leg ulceration have long been viewed as distinctly separate entities. This article explores how toe bandaging, a skill used routinely in lymphoedema practice, might benefit people being bandaged to treat venous leg ulcers. A small research study identified that 12 out of 124 people receiving high compression bandaging for venous leg ulcers without toe bandaging developed toe ulceration during a 2-year period. A second study has found no episodes of toe ulceration in patients receiving toe bandaging as part of their care. Unfortunately, there was significant heterogeneity between the two trials in terms of the client group, duration of bandaging and bandaging techniques, meaning that firm conclusions could not be extrapolated. A brief discussion of the pathophysiology and bandaging techniques used for lymphoedema and venous leg ulcers is used in this article to try and explore the rationale behind whether to bandage the toes or not, and to try and help practitioners decide whether toe bandaging should become part of all compression bandaging regimens.
淋巴水肿和伴有腿部静脉溃疡的慢性静脉功能不全长期以来一直被视为截然不同的病症。本文探讨了在淋巴水肿治疗中常规使用的一项技术——脚趾包扎,如何能使接受包扎以治疗腿部静脉溃疡的患者受益。一项小型研究发现,在124名接受高压力包扎治疗腿部静脉溃疡但未进行脚趾包扎的患者中,有12人在两年内出现了脚趾溃疡。另一项研究发现,在接受脚趾包扎作为护理一部分的患者中没有出现脚趾溃疡的情况。不幸的是,这两项试验在患者群体、包扎持续时间和包扎技术方面存在显著差异,这意味着无法得出确凿的结论。本文简要讨论了用于淋巴水肿和腿部静脉溃疡的病理生理学及包扎技术,试图探究是否对脚趾进行包扎背后的原理,并帮助从业者决定脚趾包扎是否应成为所有压力包扎方案的一部分。