Gonzalo C, Linage B, Carriedo J A, De La Fuente L F
Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Vegazana, Universidad de León, 24071-León, Spain.
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Aug;91(8):3114-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1026.
This study evaluated the performance of the DeLaval cell counter (DCC) when analyzing ovine milk with different soak times (defined as the permanence time of samples within the DCC cassette before starting the DCC counting procedure) in diluted and undiluted milk samples in 2 dairy sheep breeds. A total of 101 composite ovine milk samples (50 from Assaf ewes and 51 from Churra ewes), ranging between 50 x 10(3) and 2,200 x 10(3) cells/mL, were divided into 10 aliquots/milk to be analyzed by DCC. Four undiluted aliquots and 4 aliquots diluted 1:1 in PBS were analyzed by using soak times of 0, 1, 2, and 3 min/aliquot, and the other 2 aliquots were diluted 1:1 in propidium iodide or ethidium bromide staining solutions and analyzed by DCC. Milk samples were also analyzed by the Fossomatic method, as a reference. All analyses were carried out in duplicate. Undiluted milk samples with soak times >or=1 min showed large coefficients of regression (b = 0.96 to 0.98) and correlation (r > 0.99) when compared with the Fossomatic method. In these samples, DCC gave repeatability standard deviations (s(r) = 35 to 51 x 10(3) cells/mL) lower than other DCC analytical conditions (s(r) = 49 to 74 x 10(3) cells/mL), and their log SCC means (5.51 to 5.52) were close to the reference value (5.56). The log SCC means corresponding to samples diluted 1:1 in staining solutions (5.55) did not differ from the reference value; however, these aliquots had lower regression coefficients (b: 0.92 to 0.93). Samples diluted 1:1 in PBS and undiluted samples with a 0-min soak time showed a global accuracy similar to or lower than undiluted samples with soak times >or=1 min. Breed did not seem to affect the results. We concluded that undiluted raw milk with a soak time >or=1 min and analyzed by DCC shows suitable overall accuracy in ovine milk compared with the reference method and can be considered as the best option for on-farm use from an operational point of view.
本研究评估了利拉伐细胞计数器(DCC)在分析两个奶羊品种的稀释和未稀释牛奶样本时的性能,这些样本具有不同的浸泡时间(定义为在开始DCC计数程序之前样本在DCC样品盒中的停留时间)。总共101份混合羊乳样本(50份来自阿萨夫母羊,51份来自丘拉母羊),细胞数在50×10³至2200×10³个/mL之间,被分成10份/份牛奶用于DCC分析。四份未稀释的样本和四份用PBS 1:1稀释的样本,分别采用0、1、2和3分钟/份的浸泡时间进行分析,另外两份样本用碘化丙啶或溴化乙锭染色溶液1:1稀释后用DCC分析。牛奶样本也采用Fossomatic方法进行分析作为参考。所有分析均重复进行。与Fossomatic方法相比,浸泡时间≥1分钟的未稀释牛奶样本显示出较大的回归系数(b = 0.96至0.98)和相关性(r>0.99)。在这些样本中,DCC给出的重复性标准偏差(s(r)=35至51×10³个/mL)低于其他DCC分析条件(s(r)=49至74×10³个/mL),其对数体细胞数均值(5.51至5.52)接近参考值(5.56)。在染色溶液中1:1稀释的样本的对数体细胞数均值(5.55)与参考值无差异;然而,这些样本的回归系数较低(b:0.92至0.93)。用PBS 1:1稀释的样本和浸泡时间为0分钟的未稀释样本显示出的总体准确度与浸泡时间≥1分钟的未稀释样本相似或更低。品种似乎不影响结果。我们得出结论,与参考方法相比,浸泡时间≥1分钟且用DCC分析的未稀释生鲜羊乳在羊乳中显示出合适的总体准确度,并且从操作角度来看可被视为农场使用的最佳选择。