Cherry Elizabeth M, Evans Steven J
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Theor Biol. 2008 Oct 7;254(3):674-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.06.030. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
To date, two detailed ionic models of human atrial cell electrophysiology have been developed, the Nygren et al. model (NM) and the Courtemanche et al. model (CM). Although both models draw from similar experimental data, they have vastly different properties. This paper provides the first systematic analysis and comparison of the dynamics of these models in spatially extended systems including one-dimensional cables and rings, two-dimensional sheets, and a realistic three-dimensional human atrial geometry. We observe that, as in single cells, the CM adapts to rate changes primarily by changes in action potential duration (APD) and morphology, while for the NM rate changes affect resting membrane potential (RMP) more than APD. The models also exhibit different memory properties as assessed through S1-S2 APD and conduction velocity (CV) restitution curves with different S1 cycle lengths. Reentrant wave dynamics also differ, with the NM exhibiting stable, non-breaking spirals and the CM exhibiting frequent transient wave breaks. The realistic atrial geometry modifies dynamics in some cases through drift, transient pinning, and breakup. Previously proposed modifications to represent atrial fibrillation-remodeled electrophysiology produce altered dynamics, including reduced rate adaptation and memory for both models and conversion to stable reentry for the CM. Furthermore, proposed variations to the NM to reproduce action potentials more closely resembling those of the CM do not substantially alter the underlying dynamics of the model, so that tissue simulations using these modifications still behave more like the unmodified NM. Finally, interchanging the transmembrane current formulations of the two models suggests that currents contribute more strongly to RMP and CV, intracellular calcium dynamics primarily determine reentrant wave dynamics, and both are important in APD restitution and memory in these models. This finding implies that the formulation of intracellular calcium processes is as important to producing realistic models as transmembrane currents.
迄今为止,已经开发出两种详细的人类心房细胞电生理离子模型,即Nygren等人的模型(NM)和Courtemanche等人的模型(CM)。尽管这两种模型都基于相似的实验数据,但它们具有截然不同的特性。本文首次对这些模型在空间扩展系统中的动力学进行了系统分析和比较,这些系统包括一维电缆和环、二维片层以及逼真的三维人体心房几何结构。我们观察到,与单细胞情况一样,CM主要通过动作电位持续时间(APD)和形态的变化来适应心率变化,而对于NM,心率变化对静息膜电位(RMP)的影响大于对APD的影响。通过具有不同S1周期长度的S1 - S2 APD和传导速度(CV)恢复曲线评估,这两种模型还表现出不同的记忆特性。折返波动力学也有所不同,NM表现出稳定的、不破裂的螺旋波,而CM表现出频繁的瞬态波破裂。逼真的心房几何结构在某些情况下通过漂移、瞬态钉扎和破裂来改变动力学。先前提出的用于表示心房颤动重塑电生理的修改会产生改变的动力学,包括两种模型的心率适应性和记忆性降低,以及CM转变为稳定折返。此外,对NM进行的旨在更紧密地再现类似于CM的动作电位的提议变化并没有实质性地改变模型的基本动力学,因此使用这些修改进行的组织模拟仍然更像未修改的NM。最后,互换这两种模型的跨膜电流公式表明,电流对RMP和CV的贡献更强,细胞内钙动力学主要决定折返波动力学,并且两者在这些模型的APD恢复和记忆中都很重要。这一发现意味着细胞内钙过程的公式对于生成逼真的模型与跨膜电流一样重要。