Tenbensel Tim, Cumming Jacqueline, Ashton Toni, Barnett Pauline
University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Oct;67(7):1143-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
Since 2000, the substantive focus of health policy in New Zealand has been closely aligned to the agendas of improving population health and reducing health inequalities. Health system restructuring, through the introduction of locally based and partially elected District Health Boards (DHBs), was the structural mechanism chosen for reorienting the health sector towards population health. Strategic planning at the DHB level was the key mechanism by which central government population health objectives would be translated into local action. This analysis of the early years of elected DHBs (2001-2005) sets out to answer the following broad questions: (i) did strategic planning by District Health Boards reflect an orientation to population health?; (ii) to what extent was strategic planning towards population health shaped by community participation and input?; (iii) to what extent did strategic planning lead to a re-prioritisation of resources? These questions were explored as part of a larger research project investigating the introduction and implementation of the DHB system. Data were collected from over 350 interviews of local and national stakeholders, and two surveys of DHB Members between 2002 and 2004-2005. Overall, DHBs demonstrated the 'will' to engage in strategic decision-making processes to enhance population health but have difficulty in finding the 'way'. The priorities and requirements of central government and the weight of institutional history were found to be the most influential factors on DHB decision-making and practice, with flexibility and innovation only exercised at the margins. This raises the key question of whether there is the governmental capacity at the local level to adequately address nationally determined population health policy priorities.
自2000年以来,新西兰卫生政策的实质性重点一直与改善人口健康和减少健康不平等的议程紧密相关。通过引入基于地方且部分由选举产生的地区卫生委员会(DHBs)进行卫生系统重组,是为使卫生部门重新定位以关注人口健康而选择的结构机制。地区卫生委员会层面的战略规划是将中央政府的人口健康目标转化为地方行动的关键机制。对选举产生的地区卫生委员会早期(2001 - 2005年)的这一分析旨在回答以下广泛问题:(i)地区卫生委员会的战略规划是否反映了对人口健康的关注?;(ii)针对人口健康的战略规划在多大程度上受到社区参与和投入的影响?;(iii)战略规划在多大程度上导致了资源重新排序?这些问题是作为一个更大的研究项目的一部分进行探讨的,该项目调查地区卫生委员会系统的引入和实施情况。数据收集自对地方和国家利益相关者的350多次访谈,以及2002年至2004 - 2005年间对地区卫生委员会成员的两次调查。总体而言,地区卫生委员会表现出参与战略决策过程以改善人口健康的“意愿”,但在找到“方法”方面存在困难。发现中央政府的优先事项和要求以及机构历史的影响是对地区卫生委员会决策和实践最具影响力的因素,灵活性和创新仅在边缘地带得以体现。这就引出了一个关键问题,即地方层面是否具备政府能力来充分应对国家确定的人口健康政策优先事项。