Hogarth Lee, Dickinson Anthony, Janowski Molly, Nikitina Aleksandra, Duka Theodora
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Nov;201(1):29-41. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1244-2. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
The attentional bias for drug cues is believed to be a causal cognitive process mediating human drug seeking and relapse.
OBJECTIVES, METHODS AND RESULTS: To test this claim, we trained smokers on a tobacco conditioning procedure in which the conditioned stimulus (or S+) acquired parallel control of an attentional bias (measured with an eye tracker), tobacco expectancy and instrumental tobacco-seeking behaviour. Although this correlation between measures may be regarded as consistent with the claim that the attentional bias for the S+ mediated tobacco seeking, when a secondary task was added in the test phase, the attentional bias for the S+ was abolished, yet the control of tobacco expectancy and tobacco seeking remained intact.
This dissociation suggests that the attentional bias for drug cues is not necessary for the control that drug cues exert over drug-seeking behaviour. The question raised by these data is what function does the attentional bias serve if it does not mediate drug seeking?
药物线索的注意偏向被认为是介导人类药物寻求和复发的一种因果认知过程。
目的、方法和结果:为了验证这一说法,我们对吸烟者进行了一项烟草条件化程序训练,在此过程中,条件刺激(或S+)获得了对注意偏向(用眼动仪测量)、烟草预期和工具性烟草寻求行为的平行控制。尽管这些测量之间的这种相关性可能被视为与S+的注意偏向介导烟草寻求的说法一致,但在测试阶段添加一项次要任务时,S+的注意偏向被消除了,然而对烟草预期和烟草寻求的控制仍然完好无损。
这种分离表明,药物线索的注意偏向对于药物线索对药物寻求行为的控制并非必要。这些数据提出的问题是,如果注意偏向不介导药物寻求,那么它起什么作用?