Tamimi Rulla M, Baer Heather J, Marotti Jonathan, Galan Mark, Galaburda Laurie, Fu Yineng, Deitz Anne C, Connolly James L, Schnitt Stuart J, Colditz Graham A, Collins Laura C
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(4):R67. doi: 10.1186/bcr2128. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
At least four major categories of invasive breast cancer that are associated with different clinical outcomes have been identified by gene expression profiling: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and basal-like. However, the prevalence of these phenotypes among cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been previously evaluated in detail. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of these distinct molecular subtypes among cases of DCIS and invasive breast cancer.
We constructed tissue microarrays (TMAs) from breast cancers that developed in 2897 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study (1976 to 1996). TMA slides were immunostained for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Using these immunostain results, cases were grouped into molecularly defined subtypes.
The prevalence of the distinct molecular phenotypes differed significantly between DCIS (n = 272) and invasive breast cancers (n = 2249). The luminal A phenotype was significantly more frequent among invasive cancers (73.4%) than among DCIS lesions (62.5%) (p = 0.0002). In contrast, luminal B and HER2 molecular phenotypes were both more frequent among DCIS (13.2% and 13.6%, respectively) as compared with invasive tumours (5.2% and 5.7%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The basal-like phenotype was more frequent among the invasive cancers (10.9%) than DCIS (7.7%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). High-grade DCIS and invasive tumours were more likely to be HER2 type and basal-like than low- or intermediate-grade lesions. Among invasive tumours, basal-like and HER2 type tumours were more likely to be more than 2 cm in size, high-grade and have nodal involvement compared with luminal A tumours.
The major molecular phenotypes previously identified among invasive breast cancers were also identified among cases of DCIS. However, the prevalence of the luminal A, luminal B and HER2 phenotypes differed significantly between DCIS and invasive breast cancers.
通过基因表达谱分析已确定至少四类与不同临床结果相关的浸润性乳腺癌:腔面A型、腔面B型、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)型和基底样型。然而,导管原位癌(DCIS)病例中这些表型的患病率此前尚未得到详细评估。本研究的目的是比较DCIS病例和浸润性乳腺癌中这些不同分子亚型的患病率。
我们从参加护士健康研究(1976年至1996年)的2897名女性所患的乳腺癌中构建了组织微阵列(TMA)。TMA载玻片用雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、HER2、细胞角蛋白5/6(CK5/6)和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)进行免疫染色。利用这些免疫染色结果,将病例分组为分子定义的亚型。
DCIS(n = 272)和浸润性乳腺癌(n = 2249)中不同分子表型的患病率存在显著差异。腔面A型在浸润性癌(73.4%)中比在DCIS病变(62.5%)中更为常见(p = 0.0002)。相反,与浸润性肿瘤(分别为5.2%和5.7%)相比,腔面B型和HER2分子表型在DCIS中更为常见(分别为13.2%和13.6%)(p < 0.0001)。基底样型在浸润性癌(10.9%)中比在DCIS(7.7%)中更为常见,尽管这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.15)。高级别DCIS和浸润性肿瘤比低级别或中级别的病变更可能是HER2型和基底样型。在浸润性肿瘤中,与腔面A型肿瘤相比,基底样型和HER2型肿瘤更可能大于2 cm、高级别且有淋巴结受累。
此前在浸润性乳腺癌中确定的主要分子表型在DCIS病例中也被发现。然而,DCIS和浸润性乳腺癌之间腔面A型、腔面B型和HER2型表型的患病率存在显著差异。