den Hartog D, Dur A H M, Kamphuis A G A, Tuinebreijer W E, Kreis R W
Department of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Vondellaan 13, 1942 LE, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Hernia. 2009 Feb;13(1):45-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0420-y. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
The objective of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of ultrasonography (US) in diagnosing incisional hernias in comparison with computed tomography (CT). The CT scans were assessed by two radiologists in order to estimate the inter-observer variation and twice by one radiologist to estimate the intra-observer variation. Patients were evaluated after reconstruction for an abdominal aortic aneurysm or an aortoiliac occlusion.
Patients with a midline incision after undergoing reconstruction of an abdominal aortic aneurysm or aortoiliac occlusion were examined by CT scanning and US. Two radiologists evaluated the CT scans independently. One radiologist examined the CT scans twice. Discrepancies between the CT observations were resolved in a common evaluation session between the two radiologists.
After a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, 40 patients were imaged after a reconstructed abdominal aortic aneurysm (80% of the patients) or aortoiliac occlusion. The prevalence of incisional hernias was 24/40 = 60.0% with CT scanning as the diagnostic modality and 17/40 = 42.5% with US. The measure of agreement between CT scanning and US expressed as a Kappa statistic was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.88). The sensitivity of US examination when using CT as a comparison was 70.8%, the specificity was 100%, the predictive value of a positive US was 100%, and the predictive value of a negative US was 69.6%. The likelihood ratio of a positive US was infinite and that of a negative US was 0.29. The inter- and intra-observer Kappa statistics were 0.74 (CI 0.54-0.95) and 0.80 (CI 0.62-0.99), respectively.
US imaging has a moderate sensitivity and negative predictive value, and a very good specificity and positive predictive value. Consistency of diagnosis, as determined by calculating the inter- and intra-observer Kappa statistics, was good. The incidence of incisional hernias is high after aortic reconstructions.
本研究的目的是确定超声检查(US)与计算机断层扫描(CT)相比在诊断切口疝方面的可靠性和有效性。两名放射科医生对CT扫描进行评估以估计观察者间差异,一名放射科医生对CT扫描进行两次评估以估计观察者内差异。患者在接受腹主动脉瘤或主-髂动脉闭塞重建后进行评估。
对接受腹主动脉瘤或主-髂动脉闭塞重建后有中线切口的患者进行CT扫描和US检查。两名放射科医生独立评估CT扫描。一名放射科医生对CT扫描进行两次检查。CT观察结果之间的差异在两名放射科医生的共同评估会议上得到解决。
平均随访3.4年后,40例患者在接受腹主动脉瘤重建(80%的患者)或主-髂动脉闭塞后进行了成像。以CT扫描为诊断方式时,切口疝的患病率为24/40 = 60.0%,以US为诊断方式时为17/40 = 42.5%。以Kappa统计量表示的CT扫描与US之间的一致性测量值为0.66(95%置信区间[CI] 0.45 - 0.88)。以CT作为对照时,US检查的敏感性为70.8%,特异性为100%,US阳性预测值为100%,US阴性预测值为69.6%。US阳性的似然比为无穷大,US阴性的似然比为0.29。观察者间和观察者内Kappa统计量分别为0.74(CI 0.54 - 0.95)和0.80(CI 0.62 - 0.99)。
US成像具有中等敏感性和阴性预测值,以及非常好的特异性和阳性预测值。通过计算观察者间和观察者内Kappa统计量确定的诊断一致性良好。主动脉重建后切口疝的发生率很高。