Bhide Shreerang A, Ahmed Merina, Rengarajan Vijayan, Powell Ceri, Miah Aisha, Newbold Kate, Nutting Christopher M, Harrington Kevin J
The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.052. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
Sequential treatment (chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation; CCRT) is increasingly being used for radical treatment of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN), which results in increased myelosuppression. In this study, we review the incidence of anemia and the effect of a policy of hemoglobin (Hb) maintenance by blood transfusion on disease outcomes in these patients.
Retrospective review of the records of patients with SCCHN treated with sequential CCRT formed the basis of this study. The incidence of anemia and statistics on blood transfusion were documented. For the purpose of outcome analyses, patients were divided into four categories by (1) transfusion status, (2) nadir Hb concentration, (3) number of transfusion episodes, and (4) number of units of blood transfused (NOUT). Data on 3-year locoregional control (LRC), relapse-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
One hundred and sixty-nine patients were identified. The median follow-up was 23.6 months. The RFS (52% vs. 41%, p = 0.03), DSS (71% vs. 66%, p = 0.02), and OS (58% vs. 42% p = 0.005) were significantly better for patients who did not have a transfusion vs. those who did. The LRC, RFS, DSS, and OS were also significantly better for patients with nadir Hb level >12 vs. <12 g/dL and NOUT 1-4 vs. >4.
Our study seems to suggest that blood transfusion during radical treatment for SCCHN might be detrimental. Further research should be undertaken into the complex interactions among tumor hypoxia, anemia, and the treatment of anemia before making treatment recommendations.
序贯治疗(化疗后同步放化疗;CCRT)越来越多地用于头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)的根治性治疗,这导致骨髓抑制增加。在本研究中,我们回顾了贫血的发生率以及通过输血维持血红蛋白(Hb)水平的策略对这些患者疾病预后的影响。
对接受序贯CCRT治疗的SCCHN患者的记录进行回顾性分析是本研究的基础。记录贫血的发生率和输血统计数据。为了进行预后分析,根据以下因素将患者分为四类:(1)输血状态,(2)最低Hb浓度,(3)输血次数,以及(4)输血量(NOUT)。分析了3年局部区域控制(LRC)、无复发生存期(RFS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和总生存期(OS)的数据。
共纳入169例患者。中位随访时间为23.6个月。未输血患者的RFS(52%对41%,p = 0.03)、DSS(71%对66%,p = 0.02)和OS(58%对42%,p = 0.005)显著优于输血患者。最低Hb水平>12 vs.<12 g/dL以及NOUT为1 - 4 vs.>4的患者,其LRC、RFS、DSS和OS也显著更好。
我们的研究似乎表明,SCCHN根治性治疗期间输血可能有害。在提出治疗建议之前,应进一步研究肿瘤缺氧、贫血和贫血治疗之间的复杂相互作用。