Aladdin Yasser, Snyder Thomas J, Ahmed S Nizam
Departments of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Neurology. 2008 Aug 12;71(7):e14-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000325017.42998.d1.
Ictal and postictal language dysfunction is common and strongly predictive of language laterality in monolingual patients. For bilingual patients, selective dysfunction has been reported for a single language with focal cerebral lesions, electrical brain stimulation, and intracarotid sodium amytal.
Two right-handed Ukrainian-English bilingual patients with left perisylvian structural lesions, late onset complex-partial seizures, and postictal aphasia for English are presented and discussed with regard to mechanisms of selective aphasia and factors contributory to language lateralization in bilingual patients.
Ukrainian was the native language of both patients with English acquired after 7 years of age. Regular/video-EEG showed left temporal epileptogenesis. A 56-year-old man, who had a left hemorrhagic stroke at age 50 and had not spoken Ukrainian for 40 years, was unable to speak English for approximately 20 minutes postictally but had global preservation of Ukrainian. A 71-year-old woman, who had a left temporal epidermoid cyst and had not spoken Ukrainian since childhood, had 10- to 15-minute postictal expressive aphasia in English but not Ukrainian and preservation of comprehension in both languages.
These cases are instructive and consistent with the literature on cerebral organization of language in bilingual individuals. For both patients, postictal aphasia with preservation of Ukrainian is consistent with findings from clinical and experimental studies indicating that later age of second language acquisition (>6 years) rather than language proficiency is a primary factor in language laterality. Second, global aphasia in the man with a late lesion vs expressive aphasia with preservation of comprehension of English in the woman with a prenatal/early lesion is consistent with the atypical language laterality described for individuals with left-sided lesions sustained prior to age 5. Although neither Wada test nor fMRI was done to assure left hemisphere laterality of spoken Ukrainian and English, this is probable, and the selective postictal aphasia observed for both patients is consistent with the differential intrahemispheric organization reported for the two languages of bilingual individuals. Possible mechanisms of selective postictal aphasia, e.g., active inhibition, and differences in language networks in bilingual patients are discussed.
发作期和发作后期语言功能障碍很常见,并且能强烈预测单语患者的语言优势半球。对于双语患者,据报道在局灶性脑损伤、脑电刺激和颈内动脉注射戊巴比妥钠时,单一语言会出现选择性功能障碍。
介绍并讨论了两名右利手的乌克兰 - 英语双语患者,他们患有左侧颞周结构损伤、晚发性复杂部分性癫痫发作以及发作后期英语失语症,探讨了选择性失语症的机制以及影响双语患者语言优势半球形成的因素。
两名患者的母语均为乌克兰语,英语是7岁以后习得的。常规/视频脑电图显示左侧颞叶存在癫痫发作起源。一名56岁男性,50岁时发生左侧出血性中风,40年未说乌克兰语,发作后约20分钟无法说英语,但乌克兰语能力完全保留。一名71岁女性,患有左侧颞叶表皮样囊肿,自幼未说乌克兰语,发作后有10至15分钟的英语表达性失语,但乌克兰语未受影响,且两种语言的理解能力均保留。
这些病例具有指导意义,与关于双语个体语言脑区组织的文献一致。对于这两名患者,发作后期失语但乌克兰语保留的情况与临床和实验研究结果相符,即第二语言习得年龄较大(>6岁)而非语言熟练程度是语言优势半球形成的主要因素。其次,有晚期损伤的男性出现全面性失语,而有产前/早期损伤的女性出现表达性失语但保留英语理解能力,这与5岁前发生左侧损伤个体所描述的非典型语言优势半球情况一致。尽管未进行Wada试验或功能磁共振成像来确定乌克兰语和英语在左半球的优势情况,但很可能如此,并且两名患者观察到的选择性发作后期失语与双语个体两种语言在半球内不同组织情况相符。文中讨论了选择性发作后期失语的可能机制,如主动抑制,以及双语患者语言网络的差异。