Bartley Aundrea F, Huang Z Josh, Huber Kimberly M, Gibson Jay R
University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Neuroscience, Box 9111, Dallas, TX 75390-9111, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;100(4):1983-94. doi: 10.1152/jn.90635.2008. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
Chronic changes in neuronal activity homeostatically regulate excitatory circuitry. However, little is known about how activity regulates inhibitory circuits or specific inhibitory neuron types. Here, we examined the activity-dependent regulation of two neocortical inhibitory circuits--parvalbumin-positive (Parv+) and somatostatin-positive (Som+)--using paired recordings of synaptically coupled neurons. Action potentials were blocked for 5 days in slice culture, and unitary synaptic connections among inhibitory/excitatory neuron pairs were examined. Chronic activity blockade caused similar and distinct changes between the two inhibitory circuits. First, increases in intrinsic membrane excitability and excitatory synaptic drive in both inhibitory subtypes were consistent with the homeostatic regulation of firing rate of these neurons. On the other hand, inhibitory synapses originating from these two subtypes were differentially regulated by activity blockade. Parv+ unitary inhibitory postsynaptic current (uIPSC) strength was decreased while Som+ uIPSC strength was unchanged. Using short-duration stimulus trains, short-term plasticity for both unitary excitatory postsynaptic current (uEPSCs) and uIPSCs was unchanged in Parv+ circuitry while distinctively altered in Som+ circuitry--uEPSCs became less facilitating and uIPSCs became more depressing. In the context of recurrent inhibition, these changes would result in a frequency-dependent shift in the relative influence of each circuit. The functional changes at both types of inhibitory connections appear to be mediated by increases in presynaptic release probability and decreases in synapse number. Interestingly, these opposing changes result in decreased Parv+-mediated uIPSCs but balance out to maintain normal Som+-mediated uIPSCs. In summary, these results reveal that inhibitory circuitry is not uniformly regulated by activity levels and may provide insight into the mechanisms of both normal and pathological neocortical plasticity.
神经元活动的慢性变化通过稳态机制调节兴奋性神经回路。然而,关于活动如何调节抑制性回路或特定抑制性神经元类型,我们知之甚少。在这里,我们使用突触耦合神经元的配对记录,研究了两种新皮层抑制性回路——小白蛋白阳性(Parv+)和生长抑素阳性(Som+)——的活动依赖性调节。在切片培养中,动作电位被阻断5天,并检测抑制性/兴奋性神经元对之间的单突触连接。慢性活动阻断在两个抑制性回路中引起了相似和不同的变化。首先,两种抑制性亚型的内在膜兴奋性和兴奋性突触驱动增加,这与这些神经元放电率的稳态调节一致。另一方面,来自这两种亚型的抑制性突触受到活动阻断的不同调节。Parv+单突触抑制性突触后电流(uIPSC)强度降低,而Som+ uIPSC强度不变。使用短持续时间刺激串,Parv+回路中,单突触兴奋性突触后电流(uEPSC)和uIPSC的短期可塑性均未改变,而Som+回路中则有明显改变——uEPSC的易化作用减弱,uIPSC的抑制作用增强。在反复抑制的情况下,这些变化将导致每个回路的相对影响发生频率依赖性转变。两种抑制性连接的功能变化似乎是由突触前释放概率增加和突触数量减少介导的。有趣的是,这些相反的变化导致Parv+介导的uIPSC减少,但相互抵消以维持正常的Som+介导的uIPSC。总之,这些结果表明,抑制性回路并非由活动水平统一调节,这可能为正常和病理性新皮层可塑性的机制提供见解。