Pole Nnamdi, Neylan Thomas C, Otte Christian, Henn-Hasse Clare, Metzler Thomas J, Marmar Charles R
Department of Psychology, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Feb 1;65(3):235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been most consistently associated with exaggerated physiologic reactivity to startling sounds when such sounds occur in threatening contexts. There is conflicting evidence about whether startle hyperreactivity is a preexisting vulnerability factor for PTSD or an acquired result of posttrauma neural sensitization. Until now, there have been no prospective studies of physiologic reactivity to startling sounds in threatening contexts as predictors of PTSD symptoms.
One hundred and thirty-eight police academy cadets without current psychopathology were exposed to repeated 106-dB startling sounds under increasing (low, medium, or high) threat of mild electric shock while their eye-blink electromyogram, skin conductance, heart rate, and subjective fear responses were recorded. Measures of response habituation were also calculated. Following 1 year of exposure to police-related trauma, these participants were assessed for PTSD symptom severity.
After accounting for other baseline variables that were predictive of PTSD symptom severity (age and general psychiatric distress), more severe PTSD symptoms were prospectively and independently predicted by the following startle measures: greater subjective fear under low threat, greater skin conductance under high threat, and slower skin conductance habituation.
These results imply that hypersensitivity to contextual threat (indexed by greater fear under low threat), elevated sympathetic nervous system reactivity to explicit threat (indexed by larger responses under high threat), and failure to adapt to repeated aversive stimuli (evidenced by slower habituation) are all unique preexisting vulnerability factors for greater PTSD symptom severity following traumatic stress exposure. These measures may eventually prove useful for preventing PTSD.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)一直与在威胁情境中出现的惊人声音时过度的生理反应最为密切相关。关于惊吓反应过敏是PTSD预先存在的易感性因素还是创伤后神经敏感化的后天结果,证据存在冲突。到目前为止,还没有关于在威胁情境中对惊人声音的生理反应作为PTSD症状预测指标的前瞻性研究。
138名目前无精神病理学问题的警察学院学员在轻度电击的威胁逐渐增加(低、中或高)的情况下,暴露于重复的106分贝惊人声音中,同时记录他们的眨眼肌电图、皮肤电导率、心率和主观恐惧反应。还计算了反应习惯化的指标。在接触与警察相关的创伤1年后,对这些参与者的PTSD症状严重程度进行评估。
在考虑了其他可预测PTSD症状严重程度的基线变量(年龄和一般精神痛苦)后,以下惊吓指标可前瞻性地独立预测更严重的PTSD症状:低威胁下更大的主观恐惧、高威胁下更大的皮肤电导率以及更慢的皮肤电导率习惯化。
这些结果表明,对情境威胁的过敏(以低威胁下更大的恐惧为指标)、交感神经系统对明确威胁的反应性升高(以高威胁下更大的反应为指标)以及无法适应重复的厌恶刺激(以更慢的习惯化为证据)都是创伤性应激暴露后PTSD症状严重程度增加的独特预先存在的易感性因素。这些指标最终可能被证明对预防PTSD有用。