Levy Barcey T, Joshi Mrinalini, Xu Yinghui, Daly Jeanette, James Paul A
From the Department of Family Medicine, Pomerantz Family Pavilion, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S103-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817c6100.
Fewer than half of Americans have been screened for colorectal cancer (CRC), a largely preventable disease.
All physician members (n = 1030) of the Iowa Academy of Family Physicians were mailed a 3-page investigator-developed survey about their attitudes, barriers, and practices regarding CRC screening.
The usable response rate was 29%. Forty-three percent practiced in rural settings. Ninety-five percent felt that they were well informed about American Cancer Society guidelines and 90% tried to follow the guidelines. Most doctors (88%) disagreed with the statement that there was "no time to adequately discuss screening," but they would like more time to discuss screening. Only 40% felt their medical records were organized to easily determine screening status, 40% encouraged office staff to participate in screening, and 16% had a written policy regarding CRC screening. Physicians estimated that they recommend screening to 78% of their patients and that 54% of their patients were actually up-to-date. Discussion of CRC screening was strongly dependent on visit type, with physicians estimating that CRC screening is discussed at 11% of acute visits, 42% of chronic visits, and 87% of health maintenance visits. Several office system factors were associated with a recommendation for screening in a multivariable linear regression model (R = 0.33).
Although nearly all physicians felt that they were well informed about American Cancer Society guidelines and tried to follow guidelines for CRC screening, few had office systems to facilitate screening. Physicians would like more time to discuss screening. Office systems likely have the most potential to improve CRC screening among patients attending primary care practices.
不到一半的美国人接受过结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,而这在很大程度上是一种可预防的疾病。
向爱荷华州家庭医师学会的所有医师会员(n = 1030)邮寄了一份由研究者制定的3页调查问卷,内容涉及他们对CRC筛查的态度、障碍及实践情况。
有效回复率为29%。43%的医师在农村地区执业。95%的医师认为他们充分了解美国癌症协会的指南,90%的医师试图遵循这些指南。大多数医生(88%)不同意“没有时间充分讨论筛查”这一说法,但他们希望有更多时间讨论筛查。只有40%的医师认为他们的病历便于轻松确定筛查状态,40%的医师鼓励办公室工作人员参与筛查,16%的医师有关于CRC筛查的书面政策。医师估计他们向78%的患者推荐了筛查,其中54%的患者实际处于最新筛查状态。CRC筛查的讨论很大程度上取决于就诊类型,医师估计在11%的急性就诊、42%的慢性就诊以及87%的健康维护就诊中会讨论CRC筛查。在多变量线性回归模型中,几个办公系统因素与筛查建议相关(R = 0.33)。
尽管几乎所有医师都认为他们充分了解美国癌症协会的指南并试图遵循CRC筛查指南,但很少有人拥有便于筛查的办公系统。医师希望有更多时间讨论筛查。办公系统在改善初级保健机构患者的CRC筛查方面可能最具潜力。