Suppr超能文献

以对照组作为参考人群进行生物标志物评估和比较。

Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population.

作者信息

Huang Ying, Pepe Margaret Sullivan

机构信息

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-A410, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

Biostatistics. 2009 Apr;10(2):228-44. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn029. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

Abstract

The classification accuracy of a continuous marker is typically evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In this paper, we study an alternative conceptual framework, the "percentile value." In this framework, the controls only provide a reference distribution to standardize the marker. The analysis proceeds by analyzing the standardized marker in cases. The approach is shown to be equivalent to ROC analysis. Advantages are that it provides a framework familiar to a broad spectrum of biostatisticians and it opens up avenues for new statistical techniques in biomarker evaluation. We develop several new procedures based on this framework for comparing biomarkers and biomarker performance in different populations. We develop methods that adjust such comparisons for covariates. The methods are illustrated on data from 2 cancer biomarker studies.

摘要

连续标志物的分类准确性通常用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行评估。在本文中,我们研究了一种替代的概念框架,即“百分位数值”。在此框架中,对照组仅提供一个参考分布来标准化标志物。分析通过在病例中分析标准化后的标志物来进行。结果表明该方法与ROC分析等效。其优点在于它为广大生物统计学家提供了一个熟悉的框架,并且为生物标志物评估中的新统计技术开辟了道路。我们基于此框架开发了几种新程序,用于比较不同人群中的生物标志物和生物标志物性能。我们还开发了针对协变量调整此类比较的方法。这些方法通过两项癌症生物标志物研究的数据进行了说明。

相似文献

1
Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population.
Biostatistics. 2009 Apr;10(2):228-44. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn029. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
2
Restricted ROC curves are useful tools to evaluate the performance of tumour markers.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Feb;25(1):294-314. doi: 10.1177/0962280212452199. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
3
Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment.
Stat Med. 2017 Jul 10;36(15):2347-2362. doi: 10.1002/sim.7274. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
The optimal ratio of cases to controls for estimating the classification accuracy of a biomarker.
Biostatistics. 2006 Jul;7(3):456-68. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj018. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
5
Standardizing diagnostic markers to evaluate and compare their performance.
Epidemiology. 2005 Sep;16(5):598-603. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000173041.03470.8b.
6
A solution for the most basic optimization problem associated with an ROC curve.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2006 Dec;15(6):571-84. doi: 10.1177/0962280206070637.
7
An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures.
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):352-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00352.x.
8
A comparison of survival analysis methods for cancer gene expression RNA-Sequencing data.
Cancer Genet. 2019 Jun;235-236:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
Comparison of two correlated ROC surfaces at a given pair of true classification rates.
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 30;37(27):4022-4035. doi: 10.1002/sim.7894. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Linked CSF reduction of phosphorylated tau and IL-8 in HIV associated neurocognitive disorder.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 19;9(1):8733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45418-2.
2
More Accurate Oral Cancer Screening with Fewer Salivary Biomarkers.
Biomark Cancer. 2017 Oct 17;9:1179299X17732007. doi: 10.1177/1179299X17732007. eCollection 2017.
5
Key concepts and limitations of statistical methods for evaluating biomarkers of kidney disease.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1621-9. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013121300. Epub 2014 May 1.
6
LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS WITH STANDARDIZED MARKERS.
Ann Appl Stat. 2013 Sep 1;7(3). doi: 10.1214/13-AOAS634SUPP.
7
Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in studies that match controls to cases on covariates.
Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul;20(7):863-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
8
Diagnostic role of procalcitonin in patients with suspected appendicitis.
World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1744-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1579-z.
10
Estimating the diagnostic likelihood ratio of a continuous marker.
Biostatistics. 2011 Jan;12(1):87-101. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq045. Epub 2010 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening, or prognostic markers: an old concept in a new setting.
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jul 1;168(1):89-97. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn099. Epub 2008 May 13.
3
Evaluation of diagnostic scores with adjustment for covariates.
Stat Med. 2008 May 10;27(10):1777-90. doi: 10.1002/sim.3120.
4
Matching in studies of classification accuracy: implications for analysis, efficiency, and assessment of incremental value.
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00823.x. Epub 2007 May 14.
5
Standardizing diagnostic markers to evaluate and compare their performance.
Epidemiology. 2005 Sep;16(5):598-603. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000173041.03470.8b.
6
Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):92-105. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030814.x.
7
Combining CA 125 and SMR serum markers for diagnosis and early detection of ovarian carcinoma.
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct;95(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.039.
8
The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.
Biometrics. 2004 Jun;60(2):528-35. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00200.x.
9
Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
Biostatistics. 2004 Jan;5(1):45-60. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/5.1.45.
10
Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
Stat Med. 2003 Aug 15;22(15):2503-13. doi: 10.1002/sim.1464.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验