Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜肾盂成形术:麦克马斯特大学的最新经验

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the updated McMaster University experience.

作者信息

Dong Jihao, Wong Jaime, Al-Enezi Ahmad, Kapoor Anil, Whelan J Paul, Piercey Kevin, Matsumoto Edward D

机构信息

Medical Student.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2008 Aug;2(4):388-91. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.806.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The open Anderson-Hynes procedure has an overall success rate of 90% for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) was developed to reduce morbidity and hospital stay while preserving the excellent results. We report on the results of our experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and May 2006, 77 consecutive patients underwent LP performed by one of 4 surgeons at our institution. Patients were reassessed with ultrasound (U/S) or intravenous pyelogram (IVP) at 6 weeks. Diuretic renal scan and U/S or IVP were performed at 6 months, and subsequent follow-up included a U/S or IVP as well as clinical assessment. Patients were assessed for pain and hydronephrosis on radiologic imaging, clearance on diuretic renal scan (T(1/2)) and differential renal function.

RESULTS

We evaluated 73 patients. The mean patient age was 38 years (range 16-71 yr), the mean operating time was 218 minutes (range 110-409 min), and the mean blood loss was 57 mL (range 25-250 mL). Mean hospital stay was 3.0 days (range 2-7 d). The success rate was 90.4%, and failures were mainly due to poor function after surgery (3 patients). Pyelolithotomy was performed concomitantly on 6 patients, which on average extended operative time by 36 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Our success rates are consistent with the LP experience of other centres and are comparable with rates for the open technique. Patients had short hospital stays, and complications were negligible. With experienced surgeons, LP should be the first-line treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

摘要

目的

开放性安德森-海因斯手术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的总体成功率为90%。腹腔镜肾盂成形术(LP)的开展是为了在保持良好疗效的同时降低发病率和缩短住院时间。我们报告我们腹腔镜肾盂成形术的经验结果。

方法

2001年1月至2006年5月,我们机构的4名外科医生之一为77例连续患者实施了LP。患者在6周时接受超声(U/S)或静脉肾盂造影(IVP)复查。在6个月时进行利尿肾图及U/S或IVP检查,随后的随访包括U/S或IVP以及临床评估。对患者进行放射学影像检查评估疼痛和肾积水情况、利尿肾图清除率(T(1/2))及分肾功能。

结果

我们评估了73例患者。患者平均年龄38岁(范围16 - 71岁),平均手术时间218分钟(范围110 - 409分钟),平均失血量57毫升(范围25 - 250毫升)。平均住院时间3.0天(范围2 - 7天)。成功率为90.4%,失败主要是由于术后功能不佳(3例患者)。6例患者同时进行了肾盂切开取石术,平均使手术时间延长36分钟。

结论

我们的成功率与其他中心的LP经验一致,与开放手术技术的成功率相当。患者住院时间短,并发症可忽略不计。对于有经验的外科医生,LP应作为肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的一线治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the updated McMaster University experience.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2008 Aug;2(4):388-91. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.806.
2
McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Can J Urol. 2004 Jun;11(3):2299-302.
5
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da.
8
Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):813-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.813.
9
Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years.
Indian J Surg. 2011 Aug;73(4):264-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0237-2. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

3
Is confirmation of ureteric stent placement in laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessary?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Jun;49(6):931-936. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1560-8. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
4
Current trends in minimally invasive reconstructive urology.
J Robot Surg. 2012 Sep;6(3):179-87. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0322-3. Epub 2011 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparative study of hot-wire balloon and ureteroscopic laser.
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):823-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.823.
2
Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):707-12. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.707.
3
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard.
Urology. 2006 May;67(5):932-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.024. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
4
A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):486-91. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000205626.71982.32.
6
Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):973-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
7
A clinical pathway for laparoscopic pyeloplasty decreases length of stay.
J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):2081-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158460.45695.78.
8
Dismembered percutaneous endopyeloplasty: a new procedure.
J Endourol. 2005 Mar;19(2):210-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.210.
9
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty using endoscopic GIA stapler for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
J Endourol. 2005 Mar;19(2):143-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.143.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验