Quality of care in accredited and nonaccredited ambulatory surgical centers.

BACKGROUND

Little is known about quality outcomes in accredited and nonaccredited ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). Quality outcomes in ASCs accredited by either the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC) or The Joint Commission were compared with those of nonaccredited ASCs in Florida.

METHODS

Patient-level ambulatory surgery and hospital discharge data from Florida for 2004 were merged and analyzed. Multivariate logistic regressions were estimated separately for the five most common ambulatory surgical procedures: colonoscopy, cataract removal, upper gastroendoscopy, arthroscopy, and prostate biopsy. Statistical models examined differences in risk-adjusted 7-day and 30-day unexpected hospitalizations between nationally accredited and nonaccredited ASCs. In addition to risk adjustment, each model controlled for facility volume of procedure and patient demographic characteristics including gender, race, age, and insurance type.

RESULTS

In multivariate analyses that controlled for facility volume and patient characteristics, patients at Joint Commission-accredited facilities were still significantly less likely to be hospitalized after colonoscopy. Specifically, compared with patients treated in nonaccredited ASCs regulated by the state agency, patients treated at those facilities were 10.9% less likely to be hospitalized within 7 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.891; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 0.799-0.993) and 9.4% less likely to be hospitalized within 30 days (adjusted OR = 0.906; 95% C.I., 0.850-0.966). No other differences in unexpected hospitalization rates were detected in the other procedures examined.

DISCUSSION

With the exception of one procedure, systematic differences in quality of care do not exist between ASCs that are accredited by AAAHC, those accredited by the Joint Commission, or those not accredited in Florida.