Boyer Ty W, Levine Susan C, Huttenlocher Janellen
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, IN 47405, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1478-90. doi: 10.1037/a0013110.
Previous studies have found that children have difficulty solving proportional reasoning problems involving discrete units until 10 to 12 years of age, but can solve parallel problems involving continuous quantities by 6 years of age. The present studies examine where children go wrong in processing proportions that involve discrete quantities. A computerized proportional equivalence choice task was administered to kindergartners through 4th-graders in Study 1, and to 1st- and 3rd-graders in Study 2. Both studies involved 4 between-subjects conditions that were formed by pairing continuous and discrete target proportions with continuous and discrete choice alternatives. In Study 1, target and choice alternatives were presented simultaneously; in Study 2, target and choice alternatives were presented sequentially. In both studies, children performed significantly worse when both the target and choice alternatives were represented with discrete quantities than when either or both of the proportions involved continuous quantities. Taken together, these findings indicate that children go astray on proportional reasoning problems involving discrete units only when a numerical match is possible, suggesting that their difficulty is due to an overextension of numerical equivalence concepts to proportional equivalence problems.
先前的研究发现,儿童在10至12岁之前难以解决涉及离散单位的比例推理问题,但到6岁时就能解决涉及连续量的类似问题。目前的研究考察了儿童在处理涉及离散量的比例时出错的地方。在研究1中,对幼儿园儿童至四年级学生进行了一项计算机化的比例等价选择任务,在研究2中,对一年级和三年级学生进行了该任务。两项研究都涉及4种被试间条件,这些条件是通过将连续和离散的目标比例与连续和离散的选择项配对形成的。在研究1中,目标和选择项同时呈现;在研究2中,目标和选择项依次呈现。在两项研究中,当目标和选择项都用离散量表示时,儿童的表现明显比当其中一个或两个比例涉及连续量时更差。综合来看,这些发现表明,儿童只有在可能存在数字匹配的情况下,才会在涉及离散单位的比例推理问题上出错,这表明他们的困难是由于将数字等价概念过度扩展到比例等价问题上。