Suppr超能文献

比例推理的发展:幼儿易犯的错误。

Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong.

作者信息

Boyer Ty W, Levine Susan C, Huttenlocher Janellen

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, IN 47405, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1478-90. doi: 10.1037/a0013110.

Abstract

Previous studies have found that children have difficulty solving proportional reasoning problems involving discrete units until 10 to 12 years of age, but can solve parallel problems involving continuous quantities by 6 years of age. The present studies examine where children go wrong in processing proportions that involve discrete quantities. A computerized proportional equivalence choice task was administered to kindergartners through 4th-graders in Study 1, and to 1st- and 3rd-graders in Study 2. Both studies involved 4 between-subjects conditions that were formed by pairing continuous and discrete target proportions with continuous and discrete choice alternatives. In Study 1, target and choice alternatives were presented simultaneously; in Study 2, target and choice alternatives were presented sequentially. In both studies, children performed significantly worse when both the target and choice alternatives were represented with discrete quantities than when either or both of the proportions involved continuous quantities. Taken together, these findings indicate that children go astray on proportional reasoning problems involving discrete units only when a numerical match is possible, suggesting that their difficulty is due to an overextension of numerical equivalence concepts to proportional equivalence problems.

摘要

先前的研究发现,儿童在10至12岁之前难以解决涉及离散单位的比例推理问题,但到6岁时就能解决涉及连续量的类似问题。目前的研究考察了儿童在处理涉及离散量的比例时出错的地方。在研究1中,对幼儿园儿童至四年级学生进行了一项计算机化的比例等价选择任务,在研究2中,对一年级和三年级学生进行了该任务。两项研究都涉及4种被试间条件,这些条件是通过将连续和离散的目标比例与连续和离散的选择项配对形成的。在研究1中,目标和选择项同时呈现;在研究2中,目标和选择项依次呈现。在两项研究中,当目标和选择项都用离散量表示时,儿童的表现明显比当其中一个或两个比例涉及连续量时更差。综合来看,这些发现表明,儿童只有在可能存在数字匹配的情况下,才会在涉及离散单位的比例推理问题上出错,这表明他们的困难是由于将数字等价概念过度扩展到比例等价问题上。

相似文献

1
Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong.
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1478-90. doi: 10.1037/a0013110.
2
Children's discrete proportional reasoning is related to inhibitory control and enhanced by priming continuous representations.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Nov;199:104931. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104931. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
3
Prompting children to reason proportionally: Processing discrete units as continuous amounts.
Dev Psychol. 2015 May;51(5):615-20. doi: 10.1037/a0039010. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
Child proportional scaling: is 1/3=2/6=3/9=4/12?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Mar;111(3):516-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
5
Attending to relations: Proportional reasoning in 3- to 6-year-old children.
Dev Psychol. 2018 Mar;54(3):428-439. doi: 10.1037/dev0000440. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
6
Children's gesture use provides insight into proportional reasoning strategies.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Feb;214:105277. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105277. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
7
Conceptual structure and the procedural affordances of rational numbers: relational reasoning with fractions and decimals.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):127-50. doi: 10.1037/xge0000034. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
8
Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation.
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):189-201. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.189.
9
Proportional and functional analogical reasoning in normal and language-impaired children.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1988 Nov;53(4):440-8. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5304.440.
10
The discrimination of discrete and continuous amounts in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus).
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):145-54. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0178-8. Epub 2008 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's number line estimation strategies: evidence from bounded and unbounded number line estimation tasks.
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 7;15:1421821. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1421821. eCollection 2024.
2
Continuous and discrete proportion elicit different cognitive strategies.
Cognition. 2024 Nov;252:105918. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105918. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
3
Effects of intelligence and approximate number system on the non-symbolic division ability in preschoolers.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 23;14:961140. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.961140. eCollection 2023.
5
Proportional Reasoning Deficit in Dyslexia.
Brain Sci. 2023 May 12;13(5):795. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050795.
6
A standardised set of images for judgements of proportion.
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):3297-3311. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01970-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
7
The Role of Prior Knowledge and Intelligence in Gaining from a Training on Proportional Reasoning.
J Intell. 2022 May 25;10(2):31. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10020031.
8
Non-symbolic Ratio Reasoning in Kindergarteners: Underlying Unidimensional Heuristics and Relations With Math Abilities.
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 11;13:800977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800977. eCollection 2022.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Children's patterns of reasoning about reading and addition concepts.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2010 Jun;28(Pt 2):427-48. doi: 10.1348/026151009x424222.
2
Costs and benefits of representational change: effects of context on age and sex differences in symbolic magnitude estimation.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Sep;101(1):20-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
3
Ratio abstraction by 6-month-old infants.
Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):740-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01969.x.
4
The equality of quantity.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 May;11(5):185-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
5
Decision-making processes: sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 May;97(1):28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Feb 26.
6
The development of area discrimination and its implications for number representation in infancy.
Dev Sci. 2006 Nov;9(6):F59-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00530.x.
7
Children's learning.
Am Psychol. 2005 Nov;60(8):769-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.8.769.
8
Core systems of number.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jul;8(7):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002.
9
Infants and toddlers discriminate amount: are they measuring?
Psychol Sci. 2002 May;13(3):244-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00445.
10
Children's probability intuitions: understanding the expected value of complex gambles.
Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):103-22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00268.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验