Di Carlo Giuseppe, Kenworthy W Judson
Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, National Ocean Service/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 101 Pivers Island Road, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA.
Oecologia. 2008 Nov;158(2):285-98. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1120-0. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
Several studies addressed aboveground biomass recovery in tropical and subtropical seagrass systems following physical disturbance. However, there are few studies documenting belowground biomass recovery despite the important functional and ecological role of roots and rhizomes for seagrass ecosystems. In this study, we compared the recovery of biomass (g dry weight m(-2)) as well as the biomass recovery rates in ten severely disturbed multi-species seagrass meadows, after the sediments were excavated and the seagrasses removed. Three sites were located in the tropics (Puerto Rico) and seven in the subtropics (Florida Keys), and all were originally dominated by Thalassia testudinum. Total aboveground biomass reached reference values at four out of ten sites studied, two in the Florida Keys and two in Puerto Rico. Total belowground biomass was lower at the disturbed locations compared to the references at all sites, apart from two sites in the Florida Keys where the compensatory effect of opportunistic species (Syringodium filiforme and Halodule wrightii) was observed. The results revealed large variation among sites in aboveground and belowground biomass for all species, with higher aboveground recovery than belowground for T. testudinum. Recovery rates for T. testudinum were highly variable across sites, but a general trend of faster aboveground than belowground recovery was observed. Equal rates between aboveground and belowground biomass were found for opportunistic species at several sites in the Florida Keys. These results indicate the importance of belowground biomass when assessing seagrass recovery and suggest that the appropriate metric to assess seagrass recovery should address belowground biomass as well as aboveground biomass in order to evaluate the full recovery of ecological services and functions performed by seagrasses. We point out regional differences in species composition and species shifts following severe disturbance events and discuss ecological implications of gap dynamics in multi-species seagrass meadows.
上述多项研究探讨了热带和亚热带海草系统在受到物理干扰后地上生物量的恢复情况。然而,尽管根和根茎对海草生态系统具有重要的功能和生态作用,但记录地下生物量恢复情况的研究却很少。在本研究中,我们比较了十个受到严重干扰的多物种海草甸在沉积物被挖掘且海草被移除后的生物量(克干重/平方米)恢复情况以及生物量恢复率。三个地点位于热带地区(波多黎各),七个位于亚热带地区(佛罗里达群岛),所有地点最初均以巨藻为主。在所研究的十个地点中,有四个地点的地上总生物量达到了参考值,其中两个在佛罗里达群岛,两个在波多黎各。与所有地点的参考值相比,受干扰地点的地下总生物量较低,但在佛罗里达群岛的两个地点观察到了机会性物种(丝状针蔺和喜盐草)的补偿效应。结果显示,所有物种的地上和地下生物量在不同地点之间存在很大差异,对于巨藻而言,地上生物量的恢复高于地下。巨藻的恢复率在不同地点之间变化很大,但观察到地上恢复总体快于地下恢复的趋势。在佛罗里达群岛的几个地点,机会性物种的地上和地下生物量恢复率相等。这些结果表明在评估海草恢复时地下生物量的重要性,并建议评估海草恢复的合适指标应同时考虑地下生物量和地上生物量,以便评估海草所执行的生态服务和功能的全面恢复情况。我们指出了严重干扰事件后物种组成的区域差异和物种变化,并讨论了多物种海草甸中缺口动态的生态影响。