Suppr超能文献

对美国市面上常见防晒霜的紫外线A防护能力的体外评估。

In vitro assessments of UVA protection by popular sunscreens available in the United States.

作者信息

Wang Steven Q, Stanfield Joseph W, Osterwalder Uli

机构信息

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Dec;59(6):934-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.043. Epub 2008 Oct 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of adequate ultraviolet A (UVA) protection has become apparent with improved understanding of the mechanism of UVA-induced damage to tissues. Currently in the United States, there is no regulation on testing and labeling of sunscreens for UVA protection. In August 2007, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) addressed this issue in a proposed rule.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess in vitro the degree of UVA protection provided by 13 popular sunscreen products that are commercially available in the United States.

METHOD

Thirteen sunscreen products were purchased. UVA protection of each product was measured and assessed with 3 in vitro UVA labeling indices: (1) the FDA Proposed Amendment of Final Monograph, August 27, 2007; (2) European Commission Recommendation--the Colipa and critical wavelength methods; (3) and United Kingdom's Boots star rating system.

RESULTS

Based on the new FDA-proposed guidelines, 8 products achieved the medium protection category, and 5 products achieved high protection. The latter 5 products also fulfilled the UVA protection based on the Colipa guideline desired by the European Commission Recommendation. Nine products achieved the desired critical wavelength value of 370 or higher. Based on the United Kingdom's Boots star rating system, 6 products achieved a rating of 3 stars, and the remaining 7 products achieved no star rating.

LIMITATIONS

The study only evaluated a small number of sunscreen products, and only in vitro methods were used to assess the degree of UVA protection.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the tested sunscreens in this study offered a medium degree of UVA protection. Compared with the sunscreens in the past, this study shows that UVA protection of sunscreens has improved. Sunscreens with avobenzone and octocrylene provided a higher degree of UVA protection. Globally, there is no uniform standard on testing and labeling sunscreens for UVA protection. In the United States, the FDA has just started to create a much-needed standard. This effort is necessary to educate the public better on how to choose products with adequate UVA protection.

摘要

背景

随着对紫外线A(UVA)诱导组织损伤机制的深入了解,充分的UVA防护的重要性日益凸显。目前在美国,对于防晒霜UVA防护的测试和标签尚无相关规定。2007年8月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)在一项拟议规则中解决了这一问题。

目的

我们试图在体外评估13种在美国市面上流行的防晒产品提供的UVA防护程度。

方法

购买了13种防晒产品。使用3种体外UVA标签指数测量和评估每种产品的UVA防护:(1)2007年8月27日FDA最终专论的拟议修订案;(2)欧盟委员会建议——欧洲化妆品、个人护理用品和香水协会(Colipa)及临界波长方法;(3)英国博姿星级评定系统。

结果

根据FDA新提出的指导方针,8种产品达到中等防护类别,5种产品达到高防护。后5种产品也符合欧盟委员会建议中Colipa指导方针所要求的UVA防护。9种产品达到了370或更高的期望临界波长值。根据英国博姿星级评定系统,6种产品获得三星级评定,其余7种产品未获得星级评定。

局限性

该研究仅评估了少数防晒产品,且仅使用体外方法评估UVA防护程度。

结论

本研究中大多数受试防晒霜提供中等程度的UVA防护。与过去的防晒霜相比,本研究表明防晒霜的UVA防护有所改善。含有阿伏苯宗和二乙氨羟苯甲酰基苯甲酸己酯的防晒霜提供了更高程度的UVA防护。在全球范围内,对于防晒霜UVA防护的测试和标签尚无统一标准。在美国,FDA刚刚开始制定一项急需的标准。这一努力对于更好地教育公众如何选择具有充分UVA防护的产品是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验