Suppr超能文献

[电子学习放射学网站——质量保证的可持续性]

[eLearning-radiology.com--sustainability for quality assurance].

作者信息

Ketelsen D, Talanow R, Uder M, Grunewald M

机构信息

Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.

出版信息

Rofo. 2009 Apr;181(4):362-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027770. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to analyze the availability of published radiological e-learning tools and to establish a solution for quality assurance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Substantial pubmed research was performed to identify radiological e-learning tools. 181 e-learning programs were selected. As examples two databases expanding their programs with external links, Compare (n = 435 external links) and TNT-Radiology (n = 1078 external links), were evaluated. A concept for quality assurance was developed by an international taskforce.

RESULTS

At the time of assessment, 56.4 % (102 / 181) of the investigated e-learning tools were accessible at their original URL. A subgroup analysis of programs published 5 to 8 years ago showed significantly inferior availability to programs published 3 to 5 years ago (p < 0.01). The analysis of external links showed 49.2 % and 61.0 % accessible links for the programs Compare (published 2003) and TNT-Radiology (published 2006), respectively. As a consequence, the domain www.eLearning-radiology.com was developed by the taskforce and published online. This tool allows authors to present their programs and users to evaluate the e-learning tools depending on several criteria in order to remove inoperable links and to obtain information about the complexity and quality of the e-learning tools.

CONCLUSION

More than 50 % of investigated radiological e-learning tools on the Internet were not accessible after a period of 5 to 8 years. As a consequence, an independent, international tool for quality assurance was designed and published online under www.eLearning-radiology.com .

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析已发表的放射学电子学习工具的可用性,并建立质量保证解决方案。

材料与方法

通过大量的PubMed研究来识别放射学电子学习工具。共选择了181个电子学习项目。作为示例,对两个通过外部链接扩展其项目的数据库Compare(n = 435个外部链接)和TNT-Radiology(n = 1078个外部链接)进行了评估。一个国际特别工作组制定了质量保证概念。

结果

在评估时,56.4%(102 / 181)的被调查电子学习工具可通过其原始网址访问。对5至8年前发表的项目进行的亚组分析显示,其可用性明显低于3至5年前发表的项目(p < 0.01)。对外部链接的分析显示,Compare项目(2003年发表)和TNT-Radiology项目(2006年发表)的可访问链接分别为49.2%和61.0%。因此,特别工作组开发并在线发布了域名www.eLearning-radiology.com。该工具允许作者展示他们的项目,用户可以根据多个标准评估电子学习工具,以去除无法使用的链接,并获取有关电子学习工具的复杂性和质量的信息。

结论

在5至8年的时间后,互联网上超过50%的被调查放射学电子学习工具无法访问。因此,设计了一个独立的国际质量保证工具,并在www.eLearning-radiology.com上在线发布。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验