Cook R I, Potter S S, Woods D D, McDonald J S
Department of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1228.
J Clin Monit. 1991 Jul;7(3):217-26. doi: 10.1007/BF01619263.
Although human engineering features are widely appreciated as a potential cause of operating room incidents, evaluating the human engineering features of devices is not widely understood. Standards, guidelines, laboratory and field testing, and engineering discipline are all proposed methods for improving the human engineering of devices. New microprocessor technology offers designers great flexibility in the design of devices, but this flexibility is often coupled with complexity and more elaborate user interaction. Guidelines and standards usually do not capture these features of new equipment, in part because technology improvements occur faster than meaningful guidelines can be developed. Professional human engineering of new devices relies on a broad, user-centered approach to design and evaluation. Used in the framework of current knowledge about human operator performance, these techniques offer guidance to new equipment designers and to purchasers and users of these devices.
尽管人体工程学特性作为手术室事故的一个潜在原因已广为人知,但对设备人体工程学特性的评估却并未得到广泛理解。标准、指南、实验室和现场测试以及工程学科都是改善设备人体工程学的建议方法。新的微处理器技术为设备设计师提供了极大的设计灵活性,但这种灵活性往往伴随着复杂性和更复杂的用户交互。指南和标准通常无法涵盖新设备的这些特性,部分原因是技术改进的速度比制定有意义的指南的速度更快。新设备的专业人体工程学依赖于一种广泛的、以用户为中心的设计和评估方法。将这些技术应用于当前关于人类操作员性能的知识框架中,可为新设备设计师以及这些设备的购买者和使用者提供指导。