Schwartz D A, Galvin J R, Burmeister L F, Merchant R K, Dayton C S, Merchant J A, Hunninghake G W
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Sep;144(3 Pt 1):684-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.3_Pt_1.684.
Although asbestos bodies are easily identified in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and are thought to be strongly associated with the asbestos body burden in the lung parenchyma, the clinical utility and reliability of this biologic measure of exposure has not been sufficiently studied. To assess the clinical relevance of BAL asbestos bodies we compared this bioassay of exposure to other measures of exposure and also indices of lung disease in asbestos-exposed workers (n = 71). The median concentration of asbestos bodies was 0.8 bodies per ml of BAL fluid (range 0 to 34.3). Seven workers or 9.9% had zero asbestos bodies identified in the BAL fluid. The concentration of BAL asbestos bodies was not associated with the duration of exposure (r = -0.02), the time from first exposure to asbestos (r = 0.12), or the time since last exposure to asbestos (r = 0.05). Moreover, radiographic and physiologic measures of asbestos-induced lung disease were not found to be associated with the concentration of BAL asbestos bodies. In fact, of the seven study subjects with zero BAL asbestos bodies, the mean duration of exposure was 32 yr, and six of these subjects had radiographic evidence of asbestos-induced lung disease. To assess the reliability of measuring BAL asbestos bodies, we performed a second bronchoscopy on 54 subjects and directly compared the concentration of BAL asbestos bodies from both the first and second BAL samples. Within these 54 subjects, the concentration of BAL asbestos bodies was found to be a very reliable measure (r = 0.76; p = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
尽管在支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液中很容易识别出石棉小体,并且认为其与肺实质中的石棉小体负荷密切相关,但这种暴露生物学指标的临床实用性和可靠性尚未得到充分研究。为了评估BAL石棉小体的临床相关性,我们将这种暴露生物测定法与其他暴露指标以及石棉暴露工人(n = 71)的肺部疾病指标进行了比较。BAL液中石棉小体的中位数浓度为每毫升0.8个小体(范围为0至34.3)。7名工人(9.9%)的BAL液中未检测到石棉小体。BAL石棉小体的浓度与暴露持续时间(r = -0.02)、首次接触石棉的时间(r = 0.12)或上次接触石棉后的时间(r = 0.05)均无关联。此外,未发现石棉所致肺部疾病的影像学和生理学指标与BAL石棉小体的浓度有关。实际上,在7名BAL石棉小体为零的研究对象中,平均暴露时间为32年,其中6名对象有石棉所致肺部疾病的影像学证据。为了评估测量BAL石棉小体的可靠性,我们对54名受试者进行了第二次支气管镜检查,并直接比较了第一次和第二次BAL样本中BAL石棉小体的浓度。在这54名受试者中,发现BAL石棉小体的浓度是一项非常可靠的指标(r = 0.76;p = 0.0001)。(摘要截短于250字)