Suppr超能文献

用于管理住院成年患者短期排尿问题的尿道导管类型:Cochrane系统评价短版

Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.

作者信息

Schumm K, Lam T B L

机构信息

Academic Urology Unit/CHaRT, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(8):738-46. doi: 10.1002/nau.20645.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common hospital acquired infection. The major associated cause is indwelling urinary catheters. Currently there are many types of catheters available. A variety of specialized urethral catheters have been designed to reduce the risk of infection. These include antiseptic impregnated catheters and antibiotic impregnated catheters. Other issues that should be considered when choosing a catheter are ease of use, comfort and cost.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to determine the effect of type of indwelling urethral catheter on the risk of urinary tract infection in adults who undergo short-term urinary catheterization.

METHODS

We searched the Specialized Trials Register of the Cochrane Incontinence Group (searched September 11, 2007). We also examined the bibliographies of relevant articles and contacted catheter manufacturer representatives for trials. All randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing types of indwelling urinary catheters for short-term catheterization in hospitalized adults. Short-term catheterization was defined as up to and including 14 days, or other temporary short-term use as defined by the trialists (for example <21 days with data time points at 7-day intervals). Data were extracted by one reviewer and independently verified by a second reviewer for both the original review and for the update. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Data were processed as described in the Cochrane Handbook. Where data in trials were not fully reported, clarification was sought directly from the trialists (secondary sources were used to confirm results of one trial).

RESULTS

Twenty-three trials met the inclusion criteria involving 5,236 hospitalized adults in 22 parallel group trials and 27,878 adults in one large cluster-randomized cross-over trial. The antiseptic catheters were either impregnated with silver oxide or silver alloy. Silver oxide catheters were not associated with a statistically significant reduction in bacteriuria in short-term catheterized hospitalized adults but the confidence intervals were wide (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.15) and these catheters are no longer available. Silver alloy catheters were found to significantly reduce the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.67) in hospitalized adults catheterized for <1 week. At >1 week of catheterization the risk of asymptomatic bacteriuria was still reduced with the use of silver alloy catheters (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.80). The randomized cross-over trial of silver alloy catheters versus standard catheters was excluded from the pooled results because data were not available prior to crossover. The results of this trial indicated benefit from the silver alloy catheters and included an economic analysis that indicated cost savings of between 3.3% and 35.5%. Antibiotic impregnated catheters were compared to standard catheters and found to lower the rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the antibiotic group at <1 week of catheterization for both minocycline and rifampicin combined (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.73), and nitrofurazone (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.78). However, at >1 week the results were not statistically significant. One of 56 men in the antibiotic impregnated group had a symptomatic UTI compared with 6 of 68 who had standard catheters (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-1.63). Three trials compared two different types of standard catheters (defined as catheters that are not impregnated with antiseptics or antibiotics) to investigate infection. Individual trials were too small to show whether or not one type of standard catheter reduced the risk of catheter related urinary tract infection compared to another type of standard catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the use of silver alloy indwelling catheters for catheterizing hospitalized adults short-term reduces the risk of catheter acquired urinary tract infection. Further economic evaluation is required to confirm that the reduction of infection compensates for the increased cost of silver alloy catheters. Catheters impregnated with antibiotics are also beneficial in reducing bacteriuria in hospitalized adults catheterized for <1 week but the data were too few to draw conclusions about those catheterized for longer. There was not enough evidence to suggest whether or not any standard catheter was better than another in terms of reducing the risk of urinary tract infection in hospitalized adults catheterized short-term. Siliconized catheters may be less likely to cause urethral side effects in men; however, this result should be interpreted with some caution as the trials were small and the outcome definitions and specific catheters compared varied.

摘要

背景

尿路感染(UTI)是最常见的医院获得性感染。主要相关原因是留置导尿管。目前有多种类型的导尿管可供选择。已设计出各种专门的尿道导尿管以降低感染风险。这些包括抗菌浸渍导尿管和抗生素浸渍导尿管。选择导尿管时应考虑的其他问题包括易用性、舒适度和成本。

目的

本综述的主要目的是确定留置尿道导尿管的类型对接受短期导尿的成年人发生尿路感染风险的影响。

方法

我们检索了Cochrane尿失禁小组的专门试验注册库(检索时间为2007年9月11日)。我们还查阅了相关文章的参考文献,并联系导管制造商代表获取试验信息。所有比较住院成年人短期导尿所用留置导尿管类型的随机和半随机试验。短期导尿定义为长达14天及以内,或试验者定义的其他临时短期使用情况(例如<21天,数据时间点为间隔7天)。数据由一名审阅者提取,并由另一名审阅者对原始综述和更新内容进行独立核实。分歧通过讨论解决。数据按照Cochrane手册中的描述进行处理。如果试验中的数据未充分报告,则直接向试验者寻求澄清(使用二级来源确认一项试验的结果)。

结果

23项试验符合纳入标准,涉及22项平行组试验中的5236名住院成年人以及一项大型整群随机交叉试验中的27878名成年人。抗菌导尿管浸渍有氧化银或银合金。氧化银导尿管在短期导尿的住院成年人中未显示出菌尿症有统计学意义的降低,但置信区间较宽(RR 0.89,95%CI 0.68 - 1.15),且这些导尿管已不再可用。发现银合金导尿管可显著降低导尿<1周的住院成年人无症状菌尿的发生率(RR 0.54,95%CI 0.43 - 0.67)。导尿>1周时,使用银合金导尿管无症状菌尿的风险仍降低(RR 0.64,95%CI 0.51 - 0.80)。银合金导尿管与标准导尿管的随机交叉试验被排除在汇总结果之外,因为交叉前的数据不可用。该试验结果表明银合金导尿管有益,并包括一项经济分析,显示成本节省3.3%至35.5%。将抗生素浸渍导尿管与标准导尿管进行比较,发现对于米诺环素和利福平联合使用(RR 0.36,95%CI 0.18 - 0.73)以及呋喃西林(RR 0.52,95%CI 0.34 - 0.78),抗生素组在导尿<1周时无症状菌尿率较低。然而,在导尿>1周时结果无统计学意义。抗生素浸渍组的56名男性中有1人发生有症状的UTI,而使用标准导尿管的68名男性中有6人发生(RR 0.20,95%CI 0.03 - 1.63)。三项试验比较了两种不同类型的标准导尿管(定义为未浸渍抗菌剂或抗生素的导尿管)以研究感染情况。单个试验规模太小,无法表明一种标准导尿管与另一种标准导尿管相比是否能降低导尿管相关尿路感染的风险。

结论

结果表明,短期为住院成年人使用银合金留置导尿管可降低导尿管获得性尿路感染的风险。需要进一步的经济评估来确认感染风险的降低是否能弥补银合金导尿管增加的成本。抗生素浸渍导尿管在降低导尿<1周的住院成年人菌尿方面也有益,但数据太少,无法就导尿时间更长的情况得出结论。没有足够的证据表明在降低短期导尿的住院成年人尿路感染风险方面,任何一种标准导尿管是否优于另一种。硅化导尿管可能在男性中引起尿道副作用的可能性较小;然而,由于试验规模小且结果定义和比较的具体导尿管各不相同,该结果应谨慎解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验