Olivers Christian N L, Meeter Martijn
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):836-63. doi: 10.1037/a0013395.
What is the time course of visual attention? Attentional blink studies have found that the 2nd of 2 targets is often missed when presented within about 500 ms from the 1st target, resulting in theories about relatively long-lasting capacity limitations or bottlenecks. Earlier studies, however, reported quite the opposite finding: Attention is transiently enhanced, rather than reduced, for several hundreds of milliseconds after a relevant event. The authors present a general theory, as well as a working computational model, that integrate these findings. There is no central role for capacity limitations or bottlenecks. Central is a rapidly responding gating system (or attentional filter) that seeks to enhance relevant and suppress irrelevant information. When items sufficiently match the target description, they elicit transient excitatory feedback activity (a "boost" function), meant to provide access to working memory. However, in the attentional blink task, the distractor after the target is accidentally boosted, resulting in subsequent strong inhibitory feedback response (a "bounce"), which, in effect, closes the gate to working memory. The theory explains many findings that are problematic for limited-capacity accounts, including a new experiment showing that the attentional blink can be postponed.
视觉注意力的时间进程是怎样的?注意瞬脱研究发现,当第二个目标在第一个目标出现后的约500毫秒内呈现时,第二个目标常常会被错过,这导致了关于相对持久的容量限制或瓶颈的理论。然而,早期的研究报告了完全相反的发现:在一个相关事件之后的几百毫秒内,注意力会短暂增强,而非减弱。作者提出了一个整合这些发现的通用理论以及一个有效的计算模型。容量限制或瓶颈并没有核心作用。核心是一个快速响应的门控系统(或注意过滤器),它试图增强相关信息并抑制无关信息。当项目与目标描述充分匹配时,它们会引发短暂的兴奋性反馈活动(一种“增强”功能),旨在提供对工作记忆的访问。然而,在注意瞬脱任务中,目标之后的干扰项会意外增强,从而导致随后强烈的抑制性反馈反应(一种“反弹”),实际上这会关闭通往工作记忆的大门。该理论解释了许多对有限容量理论来说存在问题的发现,包括一项新的实验表明注意瞬脱可以被推迟。