知情同意书重要吗？
Do informed consent documents matter?
机构信息
NIEHS/NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.
出版信息
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Mar;30(2):114-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
Abstract
This commentary argues that, despite extensive critiques of informed consent documents, there are several ethical and legal reasons for investigators and IRB members to take these documents seriously.
摘要
本评论认为，尽管知情同意书受到了广泛批评，但调查人员和 IRB 成员仍有几个伦理和法律方面的理由需要认真对待这些文件。
相似文献
1
Do informed consent documents matter?知情同意书重要吗？
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Mar;30(2):114-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
2
A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.一项关于机构审查委员会成员使用知情同意紧急例外情况审查研究提案的经验的定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2007 May;33(5):289-93. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014878.
3
Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.知情同意书批准所需的机构审查委员会应急情况性质分析。
Account Res. 2015;22(4):237-45. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.956866.
4
Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries.中东阿拉伯国家国家研究伦理法规和指南综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 Dec 12;13:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-34.
5
Commentary: systems, rules and the costs of being ethical--a response to D. Chalmers and to S. Whitney and C. Schneider.评论：体系、规则与道德成本——对D. 查尔默斯、S. 惠特尼和C. 施奈德的回应
J Intern Med. 2011 Apr;269(4):403-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02351_3.x.
6
Proxy and surrogate consent in geriatric neuropsychiatric research: update and recommendations.老年神经精神医学研究中的代理同意和替代同意：更新与建议
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 May;161(5):797-806. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.797.
7
Regulating clinical research: informed consent, privacy, and IRBs.规范临床研究：知情同意、隐私与机构审查委员会
Cap Univ Law Rev. 2003;31(1):71-91.
8
Informed consent for a device investigation.器械研究的知情同意书。
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2004 May-Jun;23(3):97-8. doi: 10.1109/memb.2004.1317990.
9
[Research on the dead].[关于死者的研究]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 Jun 7;166(24):2356-9.
10
Anesthesia & Analgesia policy on institutional review board approval and informed consent for research.关于机构审查委员会批准和研究知情同意的麻醉与镇痛政策。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Mar;112(3):494-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182095c5d.
引用本文的文献
1
How are US institutions implementing the new key information requirement?美国各机构是如何实施新的关键信息要求的？
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 10;4(4):365-369. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.1.
2
Challenges in informed consent decision-making in Korean clinical research: A participant perspective.知情同意决策在韩国临床研究中面临的挑战：以参与者视角。
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0216889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216889. eCollection 2019.
3
A randomized trial comparing concise and standard consent forms in the START trial.一项在START试验中比较简明同意书和标准同意书的随机试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0172607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172607. eCollection 2017.
4
The definition of placebo in the informed consent forms of clinical trials.临床试验知情同意书中安慰剂的定义。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 25;9(11):e113654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113654. eCollection 2014.
5
Audit of the informed consent process as a part of a clinical research quality assurance program.作为临床研究质量保证计划的一部分，对知情同意过程进行审核。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):469-79. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9461-4. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
6
Evaluating the quality of information about alternatives to research participation in oncology consent forms.评估肿瘤学知情同意书中关于替代研究参与的信息质量。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Jan;31(1):18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
本文引用的文献
1
Consent documents for oncology trials: does anybody read these things?肿瘤学试验的知情同意书：有人读过这些东西吗？
Am J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec;27(6):570-5. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000135925.83221.b3.
2
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.知情同意书的可读性标准与实际可读性对比
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212.
3
Are informed consent forms that describe clinical oncology research protocols readable by most patients and their families?描述临床肿瘤学研究方案的知情同意书大多数患者及其家属能读懂吗？
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Oct;12(10):2211-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2211.
Zotero 插件