Fox Zoe, Phillips Andrew, Cohen Cal, Neuhaus Jacquie, Baxter John, Emery Sean, Hirschel Bernard, Hullsiek Kathy Huppler, Stephan Christoph, Lundgren Jens
Copenhagen HIV Programme, University of Copenhagen/Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
AIDS. 2008 Nov 12;22(17):2279-89. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328311d16f.
Interruption of a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-regimen is often necessary, but must be performed with caution because NNRTIs have a low genetic barrier to resistance. Limited data exist to guide clinical practice on the best interruption strategy to use.
Patients in the drug-conservation arm of the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) trial who interrupted a fully suppressive NNRTI-regimen were evaluated. From 2003, SMART recommended interruption of an NNRTI by a staggered interruption, in which the NNRTI was stopped before the NRTIs, or by replacing the NNRTI with another drug before interruption. Simultaneous interruption of all antiretrovirals was discouraged. Resuppression rates 4-8 months after reinitiating NNRTI-therapy were assessed, as was the detection of drug-resistance mutations within 2 months of the treatment interruption in a subset (N = 141).
Overall, 601/688 (87.4%) patients who restarted an NNRTI achieved viral resuppression. The adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for achieving resuppression was 1.94 (1.02-3.69) for patients with a staggered interruption and 3.64 (1.37-9.64) for those with a switched interruption compared with patients with a simultaneous interruption. At least one NNRTI-mutation was detected in the virus of 16.4% patients with simultaneous interruption, 12.5% patients with staggered interruption and 4.2% patients with switched interruption. Fewer patients with detectable mutations (i.e. 69.2%) achieved HIV-RNA of 400 copies/ml or less compared with those in whom no mutations were detected (i.e. 86.7%; P = 0.05).
In patients who interrupt a suppressive NNRTI-regimen, the choice of interruption strategy may influence resuppression rates when restarting a similar regimen. NNRTI drug-resistance mutations were observed in a relatively high proportion of patients. These data provide additional support for a staggered or switched interruption strategy for NNRTI drugs.
非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)治疗方案的中断常常是必要的,但必须谨慎进行,因为NNRTI对耐药的基因屏障较低。关于采用何种最佳中断策略来指导临床实践的数据有限。
对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗策略(SMART)试验中药物保留组、中断完全抑制性NNRTI治疗方案的患者进行评估。从2003年起,SMART推荐通过逐步中断(即在核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂之前停用NNRTI)或在中断前用另一种药物替代NNRTI的方式来中断NNRTI。不鼓励同时中断所有抗逆转录病毒药物。评估重新开始NNRTI治疗后4至8个月的病毒抑制率,以及在一个亚组(N = 141)治疗中断后2个月内耐药突变的检测情况。
总体而言,重新开始使用NNRTI的601/688(87.4%)患者实现了病毒抑制。与同时中断治疗的患者相比,逐步中断治疗的患者实现病毒抑制的调整优势比(95%置信区间)为1.94(1.02 - 3.69),而换药中断治疗的患者为3.64(1.37 - 9.64)。同时中断治疗的患者中,16.4%的患者病毒中检测到至少一种NNRTI突变,逐步中断治疗的患者中为12.5%,换药中断治疗的患者中为4.2%。与未检测到突变的患者(即86.7%)相比,检测到突变的患者(即69.2%)实现HIV-RNA低于400拷贝/ml的比例更低(P = 0.05)。
在中断抑制性NNRTI治疗方案的患者中,中断策略的选择可能会影响重新开始类似治疗方案时的病毒抑制率。在相对较高比例的患者中观察到了NNRTI耐药突变。这些数据为NNRTI药物的逐步或换药中断策略提供了额外支持。