Lima Viviane D, Harrigan Richard, Murray Melanie, Moore David M, Wood Evan, Hogg Robert S, Montaner Julio Sg
British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
AIDS. 2008 Nov 12;22(17):2371-80. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328315cdd3.
To examine the long-term impact of adherence on virologic, immunologic, and dual response stratified by type of HAART regimen in treatment-naive patients starting HAART in British Columbia, Canada; and to assess the degree of virologic and immunologic response associated with emergence of drug resistance, progression to AIDS, and mortality.
Eligible participants initiated HAART between 1 January 2000 and 30 November 2004, were followed until 30 November 2005, and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Virologic and immunologic responses were dichotomized at their median values. Virologic response was defined as at least 65% of follow-up time with plasma viral load (pVL) of less than 50 copies/ml. Immunologic response was defined as a CD4 cell count increase of at least 145 cells/microl. Adherence measures were based on prescription refill compliance. Proportional odds models and logistic regression were used to address our objectives.
The distribution of patient responses was 394 (44.9%) for CD4+/pVL+ (best), 350 (39.9%) for CD4-/pVL+ or CD4+/pVL- (incomplete), and 134 (15.3%) for CD4-/pVL- (worst). We found a positive correlation between adherence and virologic and immunologic responses (P < 0.01). Having worst compared with best response (reference group) was associated with higher odds of mortality (odds ratio: 6.09; 95% confidence interval: 2.57-14.42) and emergence of drug resistance (odds ratio: 10.56; 95% confidence interval: 5.93-18.81) even after adjusting for adherence and HAART regimen.
Patients not attaining the best virologic and immunologic responses are at a high risk for emergence of drug resistance and mortality, and these responses are highly dependent on the adherence level and initial HAART regimen. Patients on protease inhibitor-single did worse no matter the adherence level.
在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省开始接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)的初治患者中,按HAART方案类型分层,研究依从性对病毒学、免疫学和双重反应的长期影响;并评估与耐药性出现、进展为艾滋病和死亡率相关的病毒学和免疫学反应程度。
符合条件的参与者于2000年1月1日至2004年11月30日开始接受HAART治疗,随访至2005年11月30日,且至少有2年的随访时间。病毒学和免疫学反应按中位数进行二分法分类。病毒学反应定义为血浆病毒载量(pVL)低于50拷贝/ml的随访时间至少占65%。免疫学反应定义为CD4细胞计数至少增加145个/微升。依从性测量基于处方 refill 依从性。使用比例优势模型和逻辑回归来实现我们的目标。
患者反应分布为CD4+/pVL+(最佳)394例(44.9%),CD4-/pVL+或CD4+/pVL-(不完全)350例(39.9%),CD4-/pVL-(最差)134例(15.3%)。我们发现依从性与病毒学和免疫学反应之间存在正相关(P<0.01)。与最佳反应(参照组)相比,最差反应与更高的死亡几率(优势比:6.09;95%置信区间:2.57 - 14.42)和耐药性出现几率(优势比:10.56;95%置信区间:5.93 - 18.81)相关,即使在调整了依从性和HAART方案后也是如此。
未获得最佳病毒学和免疫学反应的患者出现耐药性和死亡的风险很高,并且这些反应高度依赖于依从性水平和初始HAART方案。无论依从性水平如何,接受单一蛋白酶抑制剂治疗患者的情况更差。