Jouve F, Graveleau N, Nové-Josserand L, Walch G
Centre orthopédique Santy, 24, avenue Paul-Santy, 69008 Lyon, France.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Nov;94(7):659-69. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 12.
Recurrent anterior dislocations associated with full thickness rotator cuff tear (RCT) carry a difficult therapeutic problem: should we treat instability and rotator cuff tear at the same time or only one of both pathologies? The goal of this study was to analyse a retrospective series of patients operated on to try to answer this question.
Twenty-eight shoulders (27 patients) were operated on between 1988 and 2002. The mean age at first dislocation was 47 years (16-65), the average delay between first dislocation and operation was 6.1 years. Twenty-four shoulders presented with recurrent dislocations and four shoulders with recurrent subluxations; the average number of dislocations was 2.6 (1-20). Preoperatively, Hill-Sachs lesion was present in 96%, anterior glenoid rim fracture in 53.5% and glenohumeral osteoarthritis was observed in 37.5%. All the cases had full thickness rotator cuff tears: isolated supraspinatus in 43%,, Supra- plus infraspinatus in 35%, supraspinatus plus subscapularis in 4% and rupture of the three tendons in 18%. An isolated open stabilization with the technique of Trillat was performed in 19 cases when the cuff was not repairable or when the patient was not willing to accept rotator cuff (RC) repair (age and motivation); the mean age of the patients was 59.3 years in this group. Whereas an open anterior stabilization (Latarjet procedure) associated with RC repair was done in nine cases (average age at operation: 40 years). All the patients were followed up and had clinical-radiographic examinations more than two years after the operation.
With a mean follow-up of 73.5 months (24-178), the average Constant score progressed from 63.1 to 78.1 points (p<0.05). Three patients who had isolated anterior stabilization had recurrence of instability (16%) whereas none of the patients with both anterior stabilization and RC repair had recurrence. Subjectively, 96% of the patients were satisfied with their operation. Postoperatively, the rate of osteoarthritis progressed to 64.3%.
The decision not to repair the RCT in 19 cases was justified by the size of the tear, the muscular fatty infiltration of the RC muscles and the age-motivation of the patients. This decision lead to a greater rate of recurrence (16%) and less satisfactory functional results but the age at FU was 20 years higher in this group than in the group with cuff repair. No patient had an isolated RC repair because 92.5% of the patients in this series had either a bony Bankart (53.5%) or a Bankart type lesion (39%). The recurrent instability in this series was clearly under the dependence of the "anterior mechanism" and not under the dependence of the "posterior mechanism". Therefore, isolated repair of the cuff has never been performed because of the fear of higher rate of postoperative instability leading to RC re-tear.
In case of recurrent dislocations associated with rotator cuff tear, treatment of instability should be proposed whereas the concomitant repair of the cuff depends upon the possibility to perform it: size of the rupture, fatty infiltration, age and motivation of the patients.
复发性前脱位合并全层肩袖撕裂(RCT)带来了一个棘手的治疗问题:我们应该同时治疗不稳定和肩袖撕裂,还是只治疗其中一种病变?本研究的目的是分析一组回顾性手术患者,试图回答这个问题。
1988年至2002年间对28个肩部(27例患者)进行了手术。首次脱位时的平均年龄为47岁(16 - 65岁),首次脱位与手术之间的平均间隔时间为6.1年。24个肩部表现为复发性脱位,4个肩部表现为复发性半脱位;脱位的平均次数为2.6次(1 - 20次)。术前,96%存在Hill-Sachs损伤,53.5%存在前盂缘骨折,37.5%观察到盂肱关节炎。所有病例均为全层肩袖撕裂:孤立的冈上肌撕裂占43%,冈上肌加冈下肌撕裂占35%,冈上肌加肩胛下肌撕裂占4%,三条肌腱断裂占18%。当肩袖无法修复或患者不愿意接受肩袖(RC)修复时(年龄和意愿),19例采用Trillat技术进行孤立的开放稳定手术;该组患者的平均年龄为59.3岁。而9例进行了开放前路稳定手术(Latarjet手术)并同时进行了RC修复(手术平均年龄:40岁)。所有患者均接受随访,并在术后两年以上进行了临床影像学检查。
平均随访73.5个月(24 - 178个月),Constant评分平均从63.1分提高到78.1分(p < 0.05)。19例进行孤立前路稳定手术的患者中有3例出现不稳定复发(16%),而同时进行前路稳定手术和RC修复的患者均无复发。主观上,96%的患者对手术满意。术后,骨关节炎发生率升至64.3%。
19例未修复RCT的决定基于撕裂的大小、RC肌肉的肌肉脂肪浸润以及患者的年龄和意愿。这一决定导致了更高的复发率(16%)和不太满意的功能结果,但该组的随访年龄比进行肩袖修复的组高20岁。没有患者进行孤立的RC修复,因为该系列中92.5%的患者存在骨性Bankart损伤(53.5%)或Bankart型损伤(39%)。本系列中的复发性不稳定明显依赖于“前向机制”,而非“后向机制”。因此,由于担心术后不稳定率较高导致RC再次撕裂,从未进行过孤立的肩袖修复。
对于复发性脱位合并肩袖撕裂的情况,应进行不稳定的治疗,而肩袖的同时修复取决于能否进行修复:撕裂的大小、脂肪浸润、患者的年龄和意愿。