Ramos-Casals Manuel, Brito-Zerón Pilar, Muñoz Sandra, Soto María-José
From Laboratory of Autoimmune Diseases "Josep Font," Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2008 Nov;87(6):345-364. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e318190f170.
In 2006, the Study Group on Autoimmune Diseases (GEAS) of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine created the BIOGEAS project, a multicenter study devoted to collecting data on the use of biological agents in adult patients with systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD). The information source is a periodic surveillance of reported cases by a MEDLINE search (last update before this writing: December 31, 2007). The analysis included a total of 19 SAD and 6 biological agents. By December 31, 2007, the Registry included 1370 patients with SAD who had been treated with biological agents (562 received infliximab, 463 rituximab, 285 etanercept, 42 anakinra, and 18 adalimumab). SAD included Sjögren syndrome (SS; 215 cases), Wegener granulomatosis (261 cases), sarcoidosis (219 cases), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; 172 cases), Behçet disease (173 cases), adult-onset Still disease (118 cases), cryoglobulinemia (88 cases), and other diseases (80 cases). The higher rate of therapeutic response was found for the use of rituximab in patients with SLE (90%), SS (91%), antiphospholipid syndrome (92%), and cryoglobulinemia (87%); infliximab in sarcoidosis (99%), adult-onset Still disease (90%), and polychondritis (86%); and etanercept in Behçet disease (96%). Results from controlled trials showed lack of efficacy for the use of infliximab in SS and etanercept in SS, Wegener granulomatosis, and sarcoidosis. In addition, an excess of side effects (>50% of reported cases) was observed for the use of infliximab in inflammatory myopathies and sarcoidosis, and for the use of etanercept in polymyositis. Sufficient data are not yet available to evaluate fully the efficacy and safety of adalimumab and anakinra in patients with SAD. In conclusion, current scientific evidence on the use of biological therapies in patients with SAD is mainly based on uncontrolled, observational data. The best results have been observed in the use of rituximab for SS, SLE, and cryoglobulinemia; infliximab for sarcoidosis and adult-onset Still disease; and etanercept for Behçet disease. Lack of efficacy was demonstrated for infliximab and etanercept in SS, for etanercept in Wegener granulomatosis and sarcoidosis, and for anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in SS. Future controlled trials are needed to confirm the potential use of biological therapies in patients with SAD.
2006年,西班牙内科医学会自身免疫性疾病研究小组(GEAS)开展了BIOGEAS项目,这是一项多中心研究,旨在收集成年系统性自身免疫性疾病(SAD)患者使用生物制剂的数据。信息来源是通过MEDLINE搜索对报告病例进行定期监测(本文撰写前的最后更新时间:2007年12月31日)。分析共纳入19种SAD和6种生物制剂。截至2007年12月31日,该登记处纳入了1370例接受生物制剂治疗的SAD患者(562例接受英夫利昔单抗治疗,463例接受利妥昔单抗治疗,285例接受依那西普治疗,42例接受阿那白滞素治疗,18例接受阿达木单抗治疗)。SAD包括干燥综合征(SS;215例)、韦格纳肉芽肿病(261例)、结节病(219例)、系统性红斑狼疮(SLE;172例)、白塞病(173例)、成人斯蒂尔病(118例)、冷球蛋白血症(88例)和其他疾病(80例)。在SLE患者(90%)、SS患者(91%)、抗磷脂综合征患者(92%)和冷球蛋白血症患者(87%)中,使用利妥昔单抗的治疗反应率较高;在结节病患者(99%)、成人斯蒂尔病患者(90%)和多发性软骨炎患者(86%)中,使用英夫利昔单抗的治疗反应率较高;在白塞病患者中,使用依那西普的治疗反应率较高(96%)。对照试验结果显示,英夫利昔单抗在SS患者中无效,依那西普在SS、韦格纳肉芽肿病和结节病患者中无效。此外,在炎性肌病和结节病患者中使用英夫利昔单抗,以及在多发性肌炎患者中使用依那西普,观察到副作用过多(报告病例的50%以上)。目前尚无足够数据充分评估阿达木单抗和阿那白滞素在SAD患者中的疗效和安全性。总之,目前关于SAD患者使用生物疗法的科学证据主要基于非对照的观察性数据。在SS、SLE和冷球蛋白血症患者中使用利妥昔单抗;在结节病和成人斯蒂尔病患者中使用英夫利昔单抗;在白塞病患者中使用依那西普,观察到了最佳效果。英夫利昔单抗和依那西普在SS患者中无效,依那西普在韦格纳肉芽肿病和结节病患者中无效,抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)在SS患者中无效。未来需要进行对照试验,以确认生物疗法在SAD患者中的潜在用途。